Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 6 of 28 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 417
  1. #76
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    72,647
    Quote Originally Posted by goingfor28 View Post
    With Bell and Landry Jones Pitts offense would be screwed.
    Without Bell but with Ben Pitts offense would still be ok.
    As great as Bell is, they can win without him. They aren't winning anything without Ben playing QB

    Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
    Exactly, Deangelo Williams says, ďremember meĒ?

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    72,647
    Quote Originally Posted by warfelg View Post
    Yes. We struggled offensively before and without him.
    So Deangelo Williams didnít fill in quite admirably? Bells the 3rd most important player in that O.

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    7,874
    Boy I would love to pick the Jaguars to win this game, but I think the Steelers just have too much. Yes Jacksonville is a serious threat and I believe they have a real chance at knocking Pittsburgh off, but I am picking the Steelers to win. Roethlisburger won't throw 5 interceptions again, Leonard Fournette won't run for 180 yards again (including a 90 yard run), and Le'Veon Bell will run for more than 47 yards this game. All of those things happened in their week 5 matchup and Jacksonville won 30-9. I believe the Jaguar defense will show up once again and hold the Steelers offense in check, but I don't expect Blake Bortles will have a good game. The man is a really bad quarterback and it will continue to show. The Steelers are badly overlooking and disrespecting Jacksonville but are probably a little too talented.

    Steelers-24 Jaguars 14

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    48,507
    Quote Originally Posted by BDawk4Prez View Post
    So Deangelo Williams didnít fill in quite admirably? Bells the 3rd most important player in that O.
    Nope not really. He doesn't have the same ability to break tackles, get the extra years, catch passes, or be flexed out as a WR.

    PROCESSING

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    26,188
    He still filled in great. Far better than the avg backup would have.

    Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

  6. #81
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    72,647
    Quote Originally Posted by goingfor28 View Post
    He still filled in great. Far better than the avg backup would have.

    Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
    This.

  7. #82
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    72,647
    Iíd rather face Bell all day everyday if it meant no ben, certainly not the other way around.

    And again, ben and Bryan are more important to the offense.

  8. #83
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    48,507
    Quote Originally Posted by goingfor28 View Post
    He still filled in great. Far better than the avg backup would have.

    Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
    He filled in admirably. Because we have a great OL. But offensively we still werenít clicking all the way.

    PROCESSING

  9. #84
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bethlehem
    Posts
    38,065
    Quote Originally Posted by warfelg View Post
    He filled in admirably. Because we have a great OL. But offensively we still werenít clicking all the way.
    Same OL, youíre saying Landry Jones and Bell would be more likely to win than Ben and Deangelo?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack of Blades View Post
    I don't consider Brand New indie. I consider them ****ing awesome and don't belong to a genre.

  10. #85
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    48,507
    Quote Originally Posted by koldjerky View Post
    Same OL, youíre saying Landry Jones and Bell would be more likely to win than Ben and Deangelo?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    The records of those combos are almost identical [emoji57]

    PROCESSING

  11. #86
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    5,132
    Quote Originally Posted by koldjerky View Post
    Same OL, youíre saying Landry Jones and Bell would be more likely to win than Ben and Deangelo?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Obviously it's Ben+DeAngelo, but that has more to do with me thinking Landry Jones sucks than anything. Ben isn't what he used to be, but the drop-off from Ben to Jones is still greater than Bell to Deangelo.

  12. #87
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bethlehem
    Posts
    38,065
    Quote Originally Posted by warfelg View Post
    The records of those combos are almost identical [emoji57]
    What sample size are we talking? I donít think over a 16 game season a Landry/bell combo isnít taking you as for as a Ben/Williams combo.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack of Blades View Post
    I don't consider Brand New indie. I consider them ****ing awesome and don't belong to a genre.

  13. #88
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    16,466
    Quote Originally Posted by BDawk4Prez View Post
    Iíd rather face Bell all day everyday if it meant no ben, certainly not the other way around.

    And again, ben and Bryan are more important to the offense.
    This. Big Ben has always worried me because he's so hard to sack. Brown straight torched CHJ the year we won a Super Bowl, and those two are the reason we lost to the Steelers... Not Bell.

  14. #89
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1,864
    Can't see Jags winning. They haven't played well in several weeks.

  15. #90
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    26,188
    I've decided I want Jax to win, just bc I want to see their D vs Brady

    Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Page 6 of 28 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •