Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 182 of 182 FirstFirst ... 82132172180181182
Results 2,716 to 2,721 of 2721
  1. #2716
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Bushwood Country Club
    Posts
    80,001
    yeah no thanks on Kuzma, he is due for a raise after next year, and is not worth more than $8-10M, but will likely demand much more.

    If you want the ultimate, you've got to be willing to pay the ultimate price. It's not tragic to die doing what you love.

  2. #2717
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    10,387
    T-Wolves trade #1, Culver & Johnson
    T-Wolves get #8, Barrett & Randle

    I really like Randle for you guys. Great relationship with DLO and him and KAT are both Wildcats. IMO great atmosphere to get the best out of Randle. KAT can shoot the 3 and Randle play down low.

    Also Barrett a way better fit then Culver. I really don't like the DLO/Culver tandem, and I like both players.
    "My cow is dead, I don't need your bull"

  3. #2718
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,243
    Quote Originally Posted by McAllen Tx View Post
    T-Wolves trade #1, Culver & Johnson
    T-Wolves get #8, Barrett & Randle

    I really like Randle for you guys. Great relationship with DLO and him and KAT are both Wildcats. IMO great atmosphere to get the best out of Randle. KAT can shoot the 3 and Randle play down low.

    Also Barrett a way better fit then Culver. I really don't like the DLO/Culver tandem, and I like both players.
    Would need an extra 1st that they have stashed.. Culver and Barrett are pretty much a wash and so are Randle and Johnson.... I believe that they have the Mav's pick next year... that would suffice I would think. ...

  4. #2719
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Maple Grove, MN
    Posts
    7,523
    Quote Originally Posted by specialiststeve View Post
    Would need an extra 1st that they have stashed.. Culver and Barrett are pretty much a wash and so are Randle and Johnson.... I believe that they have the Mav's pick next year... that would suffice I would think. ...
    Yep, I second that. I really don't like Barrett either though. I don't know, I just don't like his game at all. He would be a good player about 20 years ago.


    PSD Grammar Lesson #1:

    a) their - stands for "belonging to them"
    b) there - means "over there" as in location
    c) they're - short for "they are"

  5. #2720
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    10,387
    Quote Originally Posted by specialiststeve View Post
    Would need an extra 1st that they have stashed.. Culver and Barrett are pretty much a wash and so are Randle and Johnson.... I believe that they have the Mav's pick next year... that would suffice I would think. ...
    Culver and Barrett a wash? No way, Barrett would probably go #1 in this draft and Culver anywhere from 6 - 10. And I'm a big TT and Culver fan. I just think that if you guys are gonna build around DLO & KAT, Barrett is a much better fit with DLO then Culver.

    Randle and Johnson a wash? Also no way, Randles seasons with the Lakers were all on young tanking teams. No real identity. And his season with NY - do I need to say more, it's the Knicks. That was a waste.

    The only real season Randle played with talent, in N.O. he put up efficient all-star #s.

    Now add to the fact that he already has a good relationship with DLO and I'm sure him and KAT are good since they're both Wildcats, chemistry wouldn't be an issue.
    "My cow is dead, I don't need your bull"

  6. #2721
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,243
    Quote Originally Posted by McAllen Tx View Post
    Culver and Barrett a wash? No way, Barrett would probably go #1 in this draft and Culver anywhere from 6 - 10. And I'm a big TT and Culver fan. I just think that if you guys are gonna build around DLO & KAT, Barrett is a much better fit with DLO then Culver.

    Randle and Johnson a wash? Also no way, Randles seasons with the Lakers were all on young tanking teams. No real identity. And his season with NY - do I need to say more, it's the Knicks. That was a waste.

    The only real season Randle played with talent, in N.O. he put up efficient all-star #s.

    Now add to the fact that he already has a good relationship with DLO and I'm sure him and KAT are good since they're both Wildcats, chemistry wouldn't be an issue.
    I like RJ and Randle mind you but .... Randle is terrible from 3 and a liability on Defense... not really where the wolves are looking to go.... RJ is good but not sure he is a sure thing ... neither is Culver but he is decent on D. But in my View not worth moving up that much without another pick.... But who knows

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •