Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Windsor, Earth's Rectum (as reported by Stephen Colbert).
    Posts
    11,279

    Heat complain about officiating in series: Is this a good 'basketball' approach?

    Source: http://www.prosportsdaily.com/articl...ay-407527.html

    The Heat opened this series dominating the Hornets. The Hornets came home, defended their home court, made adjustments, and then stole one on the road.


    The Hornets have been attacking the basket all series. Game one they got 37 FTs to Miami's 21. Game 2 they got 33 to Miami's 22. Miami blew them out both games: no complaints about officiating.


    In game five, which is the point of contention for a lot of Heat fans and people within the Heat Organization, the Hornets only had 15 FT attempts to Miami's 19. Yet this is the game where they complain about the officiating.

    This thing that I hate about this, other than that this is coming from a team who has been coddled by the officials in the past, if the team's refusal to take ownership for their losses.

    You never, NEVER, lose a game based on one play. It is a fallacy. That turnover you causes in the first quarter is just as important as the foul in the final minute of play. Game five, the Heat had 14 turnovers to Charlotte's 12, but nobody is saying "We should have taken better care of the ball."

    The Hornets shot .500 from beyond the arc while the Heat shot under .300; yet nobody is saying: We need to cover the perimeter better and execute our 3's.

    Yes. The officials make bad calls. EVERY game. And for teams that get good ratings (The Lakers, the Heat, the Bulls), it's usually not a problem. However, even when it is, one bad call is not going to cost you the game. What costs you the game is you shooting under .300 from the arc while you let the other team shoot over .500. What costs you the game is when you turn the ball over more.

    Team's can't expect official to bail them out, nor can the expect officials to get every call right, or see every play the way they see it.

    Sometimes there is a pattern of behaviour, and I've see that for the Trailblazers back in the day, both against the Bulls in 92, and against the Lakers in 00. I've seen the Pacers get hammered by the officials when playing the Bulls, Knicks, and Lakers AND the Heat. I've seen the Jazz get hammered against the Bulls. I've seen the Kings get hammered against the Lakers. I've seen the Mavs and Pistons get hammered against the Heat.


    What I hate to see is a team that normally gets the benefit of the doubt actually get called even and then complain about it. Are there some bad calls? Of course? Is there a clear bias here? No. If anything, the NBA wants the Heat to win. The want an LBJ vs. Wade conference finals match-up. They have even threatened to take the All-Star game out of Charlotte because of the anti-LGBT law. So let's not pretend like the league has an agenda in this series.

    I think it is extremely unprofessional for a team like the Heat to come forward and complain about officiating rather than take ownership over their losses. It's one thing when a player, or a player's wife, or even a coach complains about officials, but when the organization comes forward, all they are doing is setting up an excuse for failure, and it is bad for the team culture.

    And coaches should set the standard. If there is a pattern that the officials are missing, sure, bring it up (like Phil Jackson bringing up the offensive fouls Dwight commits during the finals when the Lakers played the Magic). But don't use it as an excuse. Instead, call out your team and say they need to cover the perimeter better. Say they need to execute and hit their shots. Say they need to protect the ball. Because the bottom line is, whenever you enter the last minute of the game with anything less than a 10 point lead, it is your level of play that has put you in a position to lose: not the call or non-call that happens in the final seconds of the game.

    If any team puts the game in the hands of the officials making a last second call, then that team has failed up until that point and are letting chance influence the outcome of the game.

    And I don't mean this just about the Heat. I'm a Pistons fan, and the one thing I hated about our first-round series against the Cavs was how much EVERYBODY was complaining about the officials. Like, come on. The Cavs are the better team. They destroyed you. Even in game one, when the Pistons were playing above their season averages in terms of percentages, they still couldn't close out a game. The Cavs won every game because they were the better team. Did calls go their way? Yes. Did it influence the game? Perhaps in game one. Did it influence the series? Absolutely not. The Cavs were better. Period.


    Thoughts? Should coaches players, and organizations step up and take ownership over losses? Does complaining about officials only create a culture of excuses?
    Why did the chicken cross the basketball court?
    Because he heard the refs were blowing fowls.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    30,076
    I think complaining as a team, and I mean everybody, is a net negative. It causes fans to turn off and officials probably stop hearing you fairly soon. A coach making a few pointed notes about questionable tactics by the opponent is one thing, but when there is constant complaint it goes too far.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    4,219
    I'll admit I didn't read the entire post, but you'll never hear excuses from Spo or Riley.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    4,219
    & no officiating hasn't determined the outcome of this series, but when Jeremy Lin is leading all playoff teams in fouls drawn then you have a problem ..

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    15,754
    I agree that the referees aren't the main reason Miami lost those games, but I understand them working the system to get any advantage they can get.

    Here's also a little fact checking. The HEAT right now have a FT to FGA ratio of .280, during the regular season the HEAT were only .196 which tagged them as the 7th best team in not fouling.

    To put that .280 number into context, that rate would have led the NBA for this year and the past 7 regular seasons. It's also only 2nd behind the Pacers in this year's playoffs (.288). So, yes, the HEAT are committing an uncharacteristically high amount of shooting fouls based on their regular season and in comparison to other playoff teams.
    Last edited by beasted86; 05-01-2016 at 11:40 AM. Reason: Should have been FT to FGA ratio

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    8,569
    Quote Originally Posted by beasted86 View Post
    I agree that the referees aren't the main reason Miami lost those games, but I understand them working the system to get any advantage they can get.

    Here's also a little fact checking. The HEAT right now have a FG to FTA ratio of .280, during the regular season the HEAT were only .196 which tagged them as the 7th best team in not fouling.

    To put that .280 number into context, that rate would have led the NBA for this year and the past 7 regular seasons. It's also only 2nd behind the Pacers in this year's playoffs (.288). So, yes, the HEAT are committing an uncharacteristically high amount of shooting fouls based on their regular season and in comparison to other playoff teams.
    This post is really confusing. First because you have a number less than one, it should be opponent FTA to FGA, not FG to FTA (and it shouldn't be FGs anyway, which implies made shots). Secondly, your numbers seem to be wrong. The Heat opponents took 1761 FTA to 6914 FGA for a .255 ratio during the regular season, per basketball reference. I'm not sure where your numbers are from.

    http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/MIA/2016.html

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    15,754
    Quote Originally Posted by IndyRealist View Post
    This post is really confusing. First because you have a number less than one, it should be opponent FTA to FGA, not FG to FTA (and it shouldn't be FGs anyway, which implies made shots). Secondly, your numbers seem to be wrong. The Heat opponents took 1761 FTA to 6914 FGA for a .255 ratio during the regular season, per basketball reference. I'm not sure where your numbers are from.

    http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/MIA/2016.html
    Yes, it's FTs per FGA literally, but I think you should recheck your own sources, because I used the same reference and it's all spelled out there clearly.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    14,920
    Complaining was a go-to for Phil Jackson during his laker runs...and it worked.
    D. Rob gives Hakeem 40/16/7/4
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_RP3SvZ4O8
    D. Rob gives Alonzo 52/14/7
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-NRWNX7Z7Y
    D. Rob gives the Pistons 34/10/10/10
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkpT0QdUDIY
    D. Rob gives the Clippers 71/14
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ck4KXAydlkE
    D. Rob gives Shaq 36/13/7/6
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XivZd3mRVw
    D. Rob gives Ewing 45/16
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8Ddm9WVzjA
    IF YOU DON"T KNOW, NOW YOU KNOW

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    8,569
    Quote Originally Posted by beasted86 View Post
    Yes, it's FTs per FGA literally, but I think you should recheck your own sources, because I used the same reference and it's all spelled out there clearly.
    What numbers are you getting then, because in 2015-16 BBR says the Heat opponents took 6914 FGA, and 1761 FTA, which is .255 like I said.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    15,754
    Quote Originally Posted by IndyRealist View Post
    What numbers are you getting then, because in 2015-16 BBR says the Heat opponents took 6914 FGA, and 1761 FTA, which is .255 like I said.
    Team miscellaneous. Gives the "Defense four factors" stat for FT/FGA and their league ranking for the regular season.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    15,754
    Quote Originally Posted by IndyRealist View Post
    What numbers are you getting then, because in 2015-16 BBR says the Heat opponents took 6914 FGA, and 1761 FTA, which is .255 like I said.
    Also the stat uses FTs made.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    8,569
    Quote Originally Posted by beasted86 View Post
    Team miscellaneous. Gives the "Defense four factors" stat for FT/FGA and their league ranking for the regular season.
    They're calculating free throws MADE vs field goal attempts. I have no idea what that statistic is trying to show, unless they're looking to include "free throw defense". It seems like a gross error, since on the face of it the idea is to show how well you defend without fouling, and that's how you're using the stat. But that's not what it says.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    492
    it worked in 2006

    Hell, it worked 2 years ago for Jason Kidd's Nets against the Raptors in round one.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    15,754
    Quote Originally Posted by IndyRealist View Post
    They're calculating free throws MADE vs field goal attempts. I have no idea what that statistic is trying to show, unless they're looking to include "free throw defense". It seems like a gross error, since on the face of it the idea is to show how well you defend without fouling, and that's how you're using the stat. But that's not what it says.
    It shows how little your team was penalized by opponents FTs. It's really quite simple.

    If your team only makes it a habit of fouling bad FT shooters who miss, it served no real penalty other than an addition towards the 6 foul ejection.

    Nonetheless it serves as the only clear reference available. Feel free to break out your own spreadsheet and divide and get back to me. I'll be waiting here for your ranking.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,719
    Pat Riley being Pat Riley.
    Short Cut, Draw Blood

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •