Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    15,076

    Understanding the gap in NBA vs. NBAPA negotiations

    Disregard their initial proposals, or what has been speculated in media and so forth, all we have to go by is what they actually said within the past 2 days' interviews on where they are now...

    Billy Hunter on proposals: http://newyork.cbslocal.com/audio-on...e-francesa-1/#
    David Stern on proposals: http://newyork.cbslocal.com/audio-on...e-francesa-1/#


    Agreements - What they have come to term in negotiations for the past 4+ months:

    • Agreed changes to both the revenue sharing plan & system need to take place.
    • Agreed to maintain a soft cap
    • Both determine to leave guaranteed contracts in place; maintaining the ability for that to be individually negotiated between the owners and players in each new contract
    • Agreed no roll-backs on existing contracts will take place; meaning if there is a newly negotiated max salary, yearly raises, or contract length, existing contracts will not be affected, only new contracts from 2011 forward
    • Both agree on proposal of extending teams' timeline to pay bought out contracts


    Disagreements - What are still major sticking points in debates. Both sides mostly agree on this pecking order of difficulty to negotiate:

    1. Luxury Tax
    • Last CBA called for flat 1:1 ratio; $1 luxury tax per $1 over the predetermined limit
    • Owners would like a much stronger ratio to enforce the tax; propose 1.75:1 ratio first $5M over, 2:1 ratio next $5M; builds further and penalizes teams for staying over the luxury multiple years (Stern did not go into details)
    • NBAPA agrees to enforce tax, but propose 1:1 ratio over first $5M, 1.5:1 ratio next $5M, builds to 2:1 cap. Want no penalty for multiple year offenders


    2. Contract length
    • Last CBA allowed for 6yr max length for re-signing your own free agents (Bird rights), 5yr max length for signing outside free agents (Non-Bird).
    • Owners propose reduction to a system of 5, 4, and 3. One "franchise player" 5yr contract per team. All other players would choose between 4yr max length Bird rights, 3yr non-bird
    • Players offer reduction to 5yr Bird, 4yr non-bird


    3. Basketball Related Income (BRI) split
    • Split of approximately $4 Billion; last CBA allowed 57% of BRI revenue to go to players, 43% for owners. BRI is the calculation of revenue after approximately $600M is deducted for team expenses.
    • NBAPA current offer is 53% for players; would cover about $200M each year of owners claimed $300M losses
    • Owners current proposal calls for 47% for players; would amount to about $350M gain each year vs. old CBA





    There are a couple more issues (namely inter-year raises on contracts), but this is the heart of the debate and where each side stands as per their lead negotiators Billy Hunter (NBAPA Director) & David Stern (NBA commissioner). Both sides have agreed to meet with a federal mediator next Monday 10/17 to try and come to an agreement.
    Last edited by beasted86; 10-14-2011 at 01:23 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    44,166
    Are you still banned?

    Edit)
    Wait you cant answer that, hit me up whenever you get back

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    15,076
    Here's how I personally see how they could split the disagreements:

    -Luxury tax: split the difference: 1.25:1 ratio over first 5, 1.75: over next 5, builds further, but no penalty.
    -Contract length: mostly side with owners, but allow two 5yr franchise limits, instead of just 1.
    -BRI: 51% players, 49% owners. Would cover total of $300M losses.
    -Raises: Players offered reduction from 10.5% Bird/ 8% non-Bird to 8% Bird/ 7% non-Bird. Think that's a reasonable reduction.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    15,076
    Quote Originally Posted by Chronz View Post
    Are you still banned?
    I've never been banned ever.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    44,166
    Oh then turn on PM's or get a profile page

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    15,076
    Quote Originally Posted by Chronz View Post
    Oh then turn on PM's or get a profile page
    I turned both off because people would send me nonsense PMs or profile messages all the time.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    28,336
    Quality summation beasted...

    They really are not that far apart... but the players feel they have given away to much to close that gap by themselves...and the owners are more interested in putting it to the players than making a deal.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    15,076
    Quote Originally Posted by daleja424 View Post
    Quality summation beasted...

    They really are not that far apart... but the players feel they have given away to much to close that gap by themselves...and the owners are more interested in putting it to the players than making a deal.
    Based on the differences in their offers, how do think they can split the difference on the four categories of BRI%, luxury tax, contract length, and raises?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    28,336
    Quote Originally Posted by beasted86 View Post
    Based on the differences in their offers, how do think they can split the difference on the four categories of BRI%, luxury tax, contract length, and raises?
    51-49 BRI
    luxury tax up to 1.5 to 1 for first ten million, and 2 to 1 after that
    all contracts 5 year max on bird players, 4 year max on others
    raises should not be an issue... they are optional to begin with

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    15,076
    Quote Originally Posted by daleja424 View Post
    51-49 BRI
    luxury tax up to 1.5 to 1 for first ten million, and 2 to 1 after that
    all contracts 5 year max on bird players, 4 year max on others
    raises should not be an issue... they are optional to begin with
    For the most part the BRI split seems to be an issue both sides think they can overcome, it's really the system issues on top of giving up the split.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,421
    From what I've heard, both Stern and Hunter feel they can get the BRI agreed too. The bigger issues right now are the luxury tax and contract lengths.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •