Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

View Poll Results: Which way is better?

2. You may not vote on this poll
  • Super-star team-ups

    0 0%
  • Old-fashion Building

    2 100.00%
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    bottom of the bottom

    Old Fashion Way or New Trend?

    These days its all about the Super-stars teaming up on the same quest for a championship. Thing is, is having a couple or a trio of super-stars teaming up necessarily better than the old fashion-way of building a team? You can look at Bulls recent W over the Heat (then again the heat haven't contended that well Vs. the Elite. *Not to bash them just an example*).

    Having more than one super-star can have its flaws, who shoots at the end of the game?

    Is having one or 2 main stars surrounded by great role-players better? Both have Pro's and Con's so...What do you guys think? Just something to think about.
    Got the Shades Ready for All those $hiny Rings

    Quote Originally Posted by MSG34 View Post
    Carmelo Anthony has now hit as many game winning shots in a knick jersey as the Lebron, Wade and Bosh have this season

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    me personally i want a deep well rounded team,i've even spoken out against it when people suggest we should do the 3 big stars+crap formula.just give me one or 2 with a cast that plays their roles well

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts