Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,410

    If a player is more complete, does that necessarily mean he is better?

    I hear all the time how a player is more complete and more well rounded. But does that necessarily mean he is better? If Player A is more complete and well rounded than Player B, does that make him the better player?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,568
    No. Some players don't have the athleticism to put it all together sometimes.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    72,787
    No. Dwight Howard is far from a complete player...probably only 60% of what he can be...yet he is better than every other center, some of whom are complete, like Al Horford as an example.
    Hello there! Welcome to ManRam v8.00.
    Patch notes: This version is nice, funny, cool & good™ now

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,410
    Quote Originally Posted by ManRamForPrez24 View Post
    No. Dwight Howard is far from a complete player...probably only 60% of what he can be...yet he is better than every other center, some of whom are complete, like Al Horford as an example.
    Thats the thing I was looking at. Man people believe being more complete means better because you are capable of doing more things. If that is the case, then why is Howard the best center? Because there are more complete centers than him

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    T.O.
    Posts
    558
    As an individual player, then the one who is not complete will probably seem like a better player. Why? Because he is known for what he does best. For example, Dwight Howard is known as an athletic, defensive, rebounding strong guy; probably the only center to do so in the league today.

    On a team basis, the more complete player will be a better player. Why? Because he helps his team win by doing the little things. For example, Pau Gasol is a great PF/C because he plays defense/posts up, but also can shoot from the outside and setup other players.

    So IMO, to answer your question, Player A who is more well rounded is not better than Player B in most cases, but Player A will help out the team more.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    641
    it depends how complete your team is to determine how good of a player one can be

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Jolly Old England
    Posts
    24,290
    Quote Originally Posted by ManRamForPrez24 View Post
    No. Dwight Howard is far from a complete player...probably only 60% of what he can be...yet he is better than every other center, some of whom are complete, like Al Horford as an example.
    I think you hit the nail on the head there.

    If player A can do five things well, and player B can do three things spectacularly but two things below average, player A is the more complete player but not necessarily the better player. That's obviously simplifying it, but I think people can understand what I mean

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Beverly Hills, CA
    Posts
    8,181
    This is a pretty dumb question. Who cares? Its a team game.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    45,004
    Quote Originally Posted by Storch View Post
    This is a pretty dumb question. Who cares? Its a team game.
    Whats dumb about it? How does this being a team game eliminate its validity?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    13,909
    Quote Originally Posted by King P View Post
    Thats the thing I was looking at. Man people believe being more complete means better because you are capable of doing more things. If that is the case, then why is Howard the best center? Because there are more complete centers than him
    Because Howard's impact on both ends of the floor are that much larger than any other centers'... there is quite an immense drop off for the center list after Dwight's name IMO.

    Super Bowl LIII: Los Angeles Rams vs Jacksonville Jaguars

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,617
    I would say it depends on position as well as what their strong abilities are and the teammates that complement them. I think it obviously means they are better, but in the end it is a team game and the skills as a team are what matter.
    ٩(•̮̮̃•̃)۶ ٩(-̮̮̃-̃)۶ ٩(●̮̮̃•̃)۶ ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ ٩(-̮̮̃•̃)۶

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •