Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    9,493

    How good would Cleveland have been if they signed Ron Artest

    Would their record be better.... THey dont have PArker though

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    40,502
    they would certainty be better at the defensive side of the game, and probably would have a better record

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    73
    I don't think it's a great fit, Cleveland has such great chemistry and Artest could mess that up, and LeBron would have to play out of position which could hurt his effectiveness a bit (he'd still be the best player in the league but he'd be a bit worse).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    9,493
    Quote Originally Posted by LeBron2NYK View Post
    I don't think it's a great fit, Cleveland has such great chemistry and Artest could mess that up, and LeBron would have to play out of position which could hurt his effectiveness a bit (he'd still be the best player in the league but he'd be a bit worse).
    They said that he would do the same thing to Houston

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    13,219
    that wouldnt fix their pf problem.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •