Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 44
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    68

    what if the celtics kept big al?

    isn't this years celtics pretty much the same team that lost 18 in a row a few years ago?
    pierce,rondo,perkins,scal, tony allen,powe-hurt baby and pruit are draft pick from that season

    added ray allen, house ,marbury and moore

    guess that team wasn't so bad was it. pierce just missed 40 games

    could that team of won a title if they kept big al and gomes. with the addition of ray allen of course?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    23,520
    Keeg Big Al means no title. That's all that matters. Moving him was worth it. End of story.
    Quote Originally Posted by Buckwheat View Post
    i don't like girls

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    4,647
    No. There is a major reason the Celtics won. He's sitting on the bench, not playing for Minny.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    68
    ok a healthy big al

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    The Valley
    Posts
    7,988
    LOL! What if they kept big Al?

    Well 1st off... they wouldnt have KG

    and no KG means, NO NBA TITLE.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    68
    when they win the title without garnett this year i will ask you again

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by mcyz View Post
    isn't this years celtics pretty much the same team that lost 18 in a row a few years ago?
    pierce,rondo,perkins,scal, tony allen,powe-hurt baby and pruit are draft pick from that season

    added ray allen, house ,marbury and moore

    guess that team wasn't so bad was it. pierce just missed 40 games

    could that team of won a title if they kept big al and gomes. with the addition of ray allen of course?
    Did you think before you posted this bs? Rondo, Perks, and Big Baby have all come into their own because of the leadership brought on via Allen and KG... plus a couple years ago they were young and basically adjusting to the NBA as opposed to the NCAA...

    I mean if jefferson were still on the team we would be a year or two away from maybe competing for the title...

    It is an interesting though though had we kept jefferson and not traded jeff green to the thunder

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    68
    we were a year or two away when he left add ray i think they would be pretty close

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    4,647
    Quote Originally Posted by mcyz View Post
    when they win the title without garnett this year i will ask you again
    Then you won't be asking this question again. Garnett is the primary reason they won. Without him, no title. Jefferson would not have gotten you a title last year or this year, even with Ray Allen.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    8,117
    Al jeff = terrible defender

    NO TITLE

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    68
    yea you probably right but they were leading there division when pierce got hurt then tony played great till he got hurt . just wish i could of seen that team stay together for a couple years. they would be tough right now.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tunisia
    Posts
    2,945
    Quote Originally Posted by mcyz View Post
    when they win the title without garnett this year i will ask you again
    LooooooooooL i dont think so buddy. wow your funny haha..

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    68
    ok how many pts the celtics win game 7 by 20? 30?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,305
    honestly the celts got their title but they unbuilded.... Rondo , Jefferson , Gomes could have been something to build on for the future.... but hey they got their title so fkuk it

    "The Future"

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    68
    yea but danny had a good thing going. then red passed. and he doesnt want phil to get more rings. so he made a move. hopefully phil jackson retires soon. before pierce ray and garnett do.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •