Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Portland,Connecticut
    Posts
    18,172

    Gaborik headed to Rangers?

    Gaborik headed to Rangers?
    It's premature, but some people think that if the Wild are unable to sign star Marian Gaborik soon, he could be traded to the New York Rangers.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Maspeth (Queens), NY
    Posts
    29,828
    not that i wouldnt love gaborik on our team, but does sather honestly have a plan of what he's doing. does he just enter the season and say sign the top guys and trade for the top guys, there is something called a salary cap. i have a feeling that in a few years the rangers might go down under.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    28,600
    I ****ing hate threads like this with a passion.
    Follow me on Twitter or like my journalist page on Facebook

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    39,215
    I'd rather him score 5 goals for us than 5 goals against us.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    8,766
    This rumor is weeks old and it was originally Gomez for Gaborik.
    Play Well... Or Play Somewhere Else

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    105
    i think he ends up on broadway by the season opener...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,116
    Quote Originally Posted by Rangers36 View Post
    i think he ends up on broadway by the season opener...
    if he comes he's here @ the deadline or next offseason no chance he's in a rangers uniform b4 january

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,734
    If we get Gaborik we better be unloading Roszy's $5 mil... true story.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    237
    I don't see how this can be true...if the possibility of the Rangers acquiring one of the best wingers in the league was true you'd be hearing it everywhere.

    I don't think the Rangers are done this offseason, I think we're still going to see a major trade...but Gaborik? That just seems too hopeful.
    Rangers Leading Goal Scorers
    1. Zherdev [12]
    1. Naslund [12]
    2. Drury [10]
    Rangers Point Leader
    Zherdev- 32 pts.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,734
    I keep hearing about some major trade people think we might make, but realisticly, for who? I see two potential players and thats Gaborik and Kovalchuk. Even then, who do we give up? Whats the deal look like?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,947
    Quote Originally Posted by brandonwarne52 View Post
    I ****ing hate threads like this with a passion.
    Great news. Glad to know.

    Can you share any other insightful information? Check that. Maybe just don't participate in NY Rangers threads.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    28,600
    Quote Originally Posted by Desert Plains View Post
    Great news. Glad to know.

    Can you share any other insightful information? Check that. Maybe just don't participate in NY Rangers threads.
    I'll just post in ones that have legit source material behind them, so you won't even have to worry about it.

    'Insert player here' to 'insert team here' with a question mark, or multiple marks, threads are the bane of my existence. I don't care that you don't care, either.
    Follow me on Twitter or like my journalist page on Facebook

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    105
    personally i think that they have to get either kovalchuk or gaborik this year. it NEEDS to be done for the team to be as good as it was last year. when i look at what sather did this offseason it makes me scratch my head. that team was a very good team. they didnt need to go acquiring random players.

    all they needed to do was strengthen up that defense. instead of resigning rosival and signing redden(11.5 mill a year) the rangers should have:

    signed brooks oprik (made him their first priority)-- 3.75 mill (same cap hit)
    signed mike commodore-- 3.75 mill a year (same cap hit)
    signed mark streit--4.1 mill a year(same cap hit)

    that makes 11.6 mill instead of 11.5 between rosival and redden... and those are their actual salaries that they have with their teams.

    then they could have still traded tyutin and backman for fritshe and zherdev which opens up around 1.5 mill extra

    signed paul mara to 1.95 mill for 1 year (as they did)

    with not signing kalinin,naslund, voros, and rissmiller the rangers have 11.1 mill left to spend

    jagr wanted 2 years 12 mill

    avery wanted 3.75 a year at minimum from rangers

    resign them both and we have around 1.5 mill left to spend and that we dont.

    also still trade hollweg, and then unload betts and orr somewhere opens up more potential space.

    jagr-dubinsky-prucha
    zherdev-gomez-avery
    dawes-drury-callahan
    sjostrom-fritshe-korpikowski

    giradi-orpik
    staal-commodore
    mara-streit


  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,947
    Quote Originally Posted by brandonwarne52 View Post
    I'll just post in ones that have legit source material behind them, so you won't even have to worry about it.

    'Insert player here' to 'insert team here' with a question mark, or multiple marks, threads are the bane of my existence. I don't care that you don't care, either.
    Actually, maybe you should try reading my post again. I don't think I mentioned anything about caring what you think.

    The point was that if the best you have to offer is telling us you don't like the thread, then take it somewhere else - like to a Wild thread. The point of these threads is to discuss rumors like this.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    100
    Rangers36,

    I believe the current roster/lines are better than the ones you dreamed up in your offseason. But that's just my opinion...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •