Search:

Nope. This is the evidence and the appropriate context.


You must run through a lot of TP whipping that mouth hole of yours.

Jesus. You're just not going to let this go. Yes I know how this conversation started. It started by me calling out the biggest hypocrital partisan hack in this forum. If you have a problem with...

Last I checked, it was you and me having this conversation. And not only are they remotely the same, they actually are the same.

If you don't understand that words can have multiple meanings,...

For the 10,000 time, I don't give a **** if he replies to me. Your memory is as clearly ****ed up as your English and reading comprehension?

I'm assuming you meant that reply to be in response to your previous post.

You actually think he would've had those alleged documents if his father in law wasn't president. :laugh: That's political influence buddy.

My bad. Son-in-law. So now he cares?

And if you don't think his father in law's political influence allowed the alleged transfer of classified documents, you'd be dead wrong.

Again...just like you lefties with another ism word. You're worried about Republicans watering down a word that has absolutely no impact on our country while you have absolutely zero issues watering...

So now you give a **** about a son making money off his fathers political influence. Color me shocked.

And there you go again, lying out of your **** hole.

https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/state-indicator/abortions-by-race/

What was that word y'all keep talking about? Disproportionately...

They are THE major factor. Without good grades, you do not get consideration.

You didn't provide evidence. You provided a list of suspicions. If you can't decipher evidence from suspicions..ruh roh. It's gonna be a long road for you.

Good post BOP. And you even came so damn close to properly posting quotes. You're moving up.

It just seemed perfect as a follow up to your "I don't need to provide evidence for something I am certain about"

I most definitely commented on it

I think we've found valade.

:laugh2:

I don't think you're gonna do very well as a lawyer if you can't and won't provide the evidence that proves your case. Being certain of it is the polar opposite of proving it.

Lol. It's not the least bit astonishing how you conveniently forgot about 6 years ago.

The fact that you continue to use the word tangerine is certifiable by itself. Childish at the least.

I'm pretty sure the question included the words 'provable acts'.

:laugh: That's gotta be someone from this forum.

The evidence wasn't looked for.

:laugh:

That would be beacuse you think every Republican was and still is a trump dick sucker.