Yeah I was being an idiot lol. I was thinking it basically just turns Dak into a restricted FA, which would be a terrible deal for players.
Type: Posts; User: Mamba42
Yeah I was being an idiot lol. I was thinking it basically just turns Dak into a restricted FA, which would be a terrible deal for players.
:clap:
Definitely. NY has more to do and a lot more variety and diversity, but I can't get over the trash in the streets lol.
Wow, I didn't realize they were that high. That's essentially what Robert Quinn is making...
It's still a bit of a risk given his injury history but I guess that's about the going rate.
I would agree with this. He should retire, but who knows what's going on in his mind
Yes, that's right.
I guess reading more on the non-exclusive tag, Dak could still just sign the 1 year deal with Dallas at $37M instead of a long term with with another team. Effectively still putting Dallas in a tough...
Does anyone know the downside to the non-exclusive franchise tag? Like why didn't Washington use it on Cousins when he left?
Yeah probably not, but they'd still field a competitive team and once the playoffs begin you never know what'll happen.
Plus, if we did that and got 2 first rounders for Dak we could swing those to Seattle for Wilson too.
Plus you would leave yourself with a lot of room to improve other ares (*cough* safety *cough* defensive tackle *cough*). If we can resign Dak to a longer contract where we can spread the cap out to...
I also don't think Dallas can afford to tag Prescott. I used to think it was a foregone conclusion that they would use the exclusive franchise tag on him, but looking at the numbers if they do that...
I am starting to warm up to that idea some more. I think Dak is awesome, but with the cap going down I'm not sure how Dallas could field a competitive team with that big of a hit to their cap. You...
Yeah, it's absurd he thinks that he should be paid close to Mahomes money. Dak should get paid well, but probably something more like $39M like Watson.
I think that Mr.B and Mariner have it right:...
:laugh: I guarantee he does.
I'll take Boston over NY every time. I'm biased because I lived there for 5 years lol, but NY is a mess.
Interesting. I guess I am just really impressed by how Surtain played in college. I am always really cautious of getting caught up in 40 times. There is also the added benefit of already having built...
I'd also like him as the backup. Alex Jackson just doesn't do it for me. I had hoped he could turn it around after we brought him here as a reclamation project but he just hasn't shown anything to me.
I thought it would go DiNucci - Smith - Wilson, but that's just me.
Lol players will still go to NE. It's a big market in probably the best east coast city. It's more about when the Pats will decide to bring big players in again as right now they should be looking to...
Yeah he would make sense in a lot of places. It just depends on what he wants to do right now (i.e. play on a team looking to compete or on a rebuilding team).
Ben DiNucci of course.
Fair enough, I haven't looked into the more advanced metrics of his performance. I know sacks aren't the end-all-be-all (see: Demarcus Lawrence), but for a guy like Watt who used to get around 1 sack...
Smith will definitely land somewhere if he still wants to play. I'd take him in Dallas as the backup if we can't bring back Dalton
I just don't see the benefits at $15.5M a year. You're paying for the best Watt who has only showed up 1 time in 5 years.
He has played in a full season in 2 of the last 5 seasons. He was awesome in 2018. He was OK last year. He is probably going to top out around 8 sacks in a full season. I just don't see dedicating...