Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Search:

Type: Posts; User: natepro

Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.09 seconds.

  1. If those laws are unconstitutional, they are...

    If those laws are unconstitutional, they are because the constitution guarantees the right to an abortion. Otherwise, they wouldn't violate the constitution.

    SCOTUS never said abortions could be...
  2. And talking about me again.

    And talking about me again.
  3. And you're back to being creepy. I'm legitimately...

    And you're back to being creepy. I'm legitimately surprised you held on as long as you did.

    As far as "you always make the discussion about you and not the facts," Let's just compare and contrast,...
  4. You're the one that created this "rabbit hole."

    You're the one that created this "rabbit hole."
  5. When did it have the votes to pass? When did...

    When did it have the votes to pass? When did Democrats have enough pro-choice votes to stop the filibuster?
  6. Except, as I've shown you, they didn't.

    Except, as I've shown you, they didn't.
  7. You mean like you accepted the facts I just laid...

    You mean like you accepted the facts I just laid out?
  8. There it is. It's almost admirable the way you...

    There it is.

    It's almost admirable the way you don't allow reality to get in the way of a line you've latched on to.
  9. It does matter, actually. The idea that the...

    It does matter, actually. The idea that the Democrats had a filibuster-proof majority that could've passed abortion legislation is not one based in reality. They couldn't even keep mandated abortion...
  10. I know you are. I'm trying to correct the...

    I know you are. I'm trying to correct the mistaken idea you've taken from the article. Do you have any idea how long, or when, that "brief period" was?
  11. Yes, I'm aware of what it said. Do you have any...

    Yes, I'm aware of what it said. Do you have any idea how long, or when, that "brief period" was?
  12. All of 2009?

    All of 2009?
  13. I want to hear what you think they should do...

    I want to hear what you think they should do instead of trying to campaign on this issue. I haven't said anything, anywhere, about "packing the courts."
  14. I'm not really sure what the "here you go" is for...

    I'm not really sure what the "here you go" is for since I didn't ask for any of that but... thanks?

    When did the Democrats have their filibuster-proof supermajority in the Senate?
  15. You're telling me what they should've done when I...

    You're telling me what they should've done when I asked you what they should be doing. Unless you have a time machine I'm unaware of, none of that is an answer.
  16. So what should they be doing?

    So what should they be doing?
  17. Of course it is. I do not get this insistence...

    Of course it is.

    I do not get this insistence on being ignorant to the ways campaigns and elections work, and then being upset when things don't turn out the way you want them to.
  18. Yes, I obviously take full responsibility for...

    Yes, I obviously take full responsibility for what the US House and Senate did and did not do in 2009. This makes perfect sense.

    So what rights should we get to codifying into law now, before this...
  19. 45 years? :laugh2: So now you're including years...

    45 years? :laugh2: So now you're including years in which they didn't hold a majority in either chamber or the White House? Could you be any more transparent?


    Once upon a time, precedent meant...
  20. Yeah, the Republicans definitely wouldn't change...

    Yeah, the Republicans definitely wouldn't change the filibuster rules for something they wanted to pass.


    And I'll ask again: Are we going to start blaming one side or the other for not enacting...
  21. And they would've simply overturned it in 2016.

    And they would've simply overturned it in 2016.
  22. Except that is very specifically exactly what...

    Except that is very specifically exactly what they want to do. You can argue that they don't view it as a right anyone should have, but none of that changes what they want to do.

    I'm not sure how...
  23. What? The only reason Roe existed as a case was...

    What? The only reason Roe existed as a case was because of a law banning abortion. There was no case to try if there wasn't a law preventing the abortion from happening. The "Wade" in Roe v Wade was...
  24. Replies
    69
    Views
    1,703

    The Bible gets Pi wrong. :shrug:

    The Bible gets Pi wrong. :shrug:
  25. I can never remember if we're supposed to believe...

    I can never remember if we're supposed to believe unnamed sources or not.
Results 1 to 25 of 200
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4