Mamba would of given 7 million. You would of given 12 million. The probable highest bidder gave him slightly less then last year. That’s why he had no trade value and was released.
Type: Posts; User: mariner4life
Mamba would of given 7 million. You would of given 12 million. The probable highest bidder gave him slightly less then last year. That’s why he had no trade value and was released.
I tried to warn people of those silly reports.
It’s fun and interesting to post links of rumours and sometimes they’re right. I’m just not sure why some of us take it as gospel though.
Ya sorry a typo on my part.
The tag your thinking about is the transition tag is where you get nothing.
The non exclusive tag you get two firsts if you don’t decide to match.
Either way this...
Part of me wishes they gave Dak the exclusive tag and let him negotiate with everyone.
It more practical but sends the wrong message that you don’t want the player.
Take the highest offer then...
It’s not even greed to make the tags the starting point. If Prescott knows he’s getting 37 million this year why would he accept less on a long term contract?
You haven’t seen it? You do understand...
I was the first between us to say that neither of us has seen the contract.
Simply put the two tags were the starting point in negotiations. While overall it’s not a good plan to tag Dak it was...
That’s a lot more realistic then a lot of other trades I’ve seen. For Wilson to go to Dallas a third team is necessary.
I’m not sure if you’re confusing cap hits to actual payed money. Undoubtedly he would of had over 100 million guaranteed basically making the first 3 seasons guaranteed.
Had he signed last year he...
I understand all of that but regardless I’m thinking Dak would of made more then the two tags combined.
Even if the last two years would of been non guaranteed he would of had more money through...
How can you say no with certainty?
It may be true or false but the reported contract offered last year was higher then 35 million per year. There was apparently over 100 million in guarantees.
Giving him the money he wants and asking for more years is not a bad thing. The cowboys wanting more years to lower the initial cap hit to have a better team around him is a healthy compromise.
Tagging him for two seasons at 70 million is cheaper then what he wanted.
I agree with you but it didn’t stop some here from posting detailed bears offers on a daily basis.
The initial reports were of the bears making numerous offers. Some including Foles. It was widely reported that a team was offering a first round pick from this draft.
Now it’s being reported that...
Did we not learn anything through the Wentz trade offers reporting?
They were all wrong and not even close.
You’re confusing draft board vs draft predictions. QBs get drafted much higher because of need. The 4th rated QB is not a higher prospect then the number one corner. The fact that the QB will be...
Here’s the list of TEs drafted in the first round.
http://www.drafthistory.com/index.php/positions/te
I realize that but you guys already have a good TE. I know you can have both on the field at the same time but it just feels like overkill.
Oh I agree with you. Just meant that if they took him he would be that high on their board.
Personally I think WR is much greater need then TE.
I guess the eagles taking Pitts is similar to when the cowboys took Lamb last year.
BPA over need.
Watson didn’t throw them under the bus. He just got frustrated with how dysfunctional the organization was.
There not hurting Watson at all but rather just trying to maximize their return.
He...
Teddy basically only has one year left then he can be cut for a cheap price.
It’s funny, your general feeling about Teddy is how I feel about Cam.
Dallas wins the division but loses right away in the playoffs.
Cams deep ball accuracy is either first or not even on the list depending on the qualifier.
Not all his fault because of his surroundings but not enough of a sample size to credit his deep passes.
I would hate to see the eagles grab a QB to be honest.