Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Search:

Type: Posts; User: natepro

Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.06 seconds.

  1. It can definitely only be a conspiracy that a...

    It can definitely only be a conspiracy that a clinic offering no-cost or lost-cost health services is located in an area where people would need exactly that sort of thing. You've cracked the case...
  2. No part of that quote is referencing abortion....

    No part of that quote is referencing abortion. It's also wildly taken out of context, which I'm sure you've been told multiple times by now.
  3. Thread: Scotus

    by natepro
    Replies
    316
    Views
    10,275

    It's pretty exciting that SCOTUS decided to set...

    It's pretty exciting that SCOTUS decided to set this time aside to take a bit dump on the sovereign status of Native reservations based on numbers from Oklahoma that they have never provided a source...
  4. I'd think it would be considered fruit of the...

    I'd think it would be considered fruit of the poisoned tree, since it was a state action that caused the exposure.
  5. It's amazing how convenient "history and...

    It's amazing how convenient "history and tradition" is going to be for straight white Christians in this country.
  6. Anyway, overturning Roe was just about letting...

    Anyway, overturning Roe was just about letting the states make the decision, it's not like they're going to try to use it to...

    Alabama cites Roe decision in urging court to let state ban trans...
  7. Remember death panels? That was fun.

    Remember death panels? That was fun.
  8. If those laws are unconstitutional, they are...

    If those laws are unconstitutional, they are because the constitution guarantees the right to an abortion. Otherwise, they wouldn't violate the constitution.

    SCOTUS never said abortions could be...
  9. And talking about me again.

    And talking about me again.
  10. And you're back to being creepy. I'm legitimately...

    And you're back to being creepy. I'm legitimately surprised you held on as long as you did.

    As far as "you always make the discussion about you and not the facts," Let's just compare and contrast,...
  11. You're the one that created this "rabbit hole."

    You're the one that created this "rabbit hole."
  12. When did it have the votes to pass? When did...

    When did it have the votes to pass? When did Democrats have enough pro-choice votes to stop the filibuster?
  13. Except, as I've shown you, they didn't.

    Except, as I've shown you, they didn't.
  14. You mean like you accepted the facts I just laid...

    You mean like you accepted the facts I just laid out?
  15. There it is. It's almost admirable the way you...

    There it is.

    It's almost admirable the way you don't allow reality to get in the way of a line you've latched on to.
  16. It does matter, actually. The idea that the...

    It does matter, actually. The idea that the Democrats had a filibuster-proof majority that could've passed abortion legislation is not one based in reality. They couldn't even keep mandated abortion...
  17. I know you are. I'm trying to correct the...

    I know you are. I'm trying to correct the mistaken idea you've taken from the article. Do you have any idea how long, or when, that "brief period" was?
  18. Yes, I'm aware of what it said. Do you have any...

    Yes, I'm aware of what it said. Do you have any idea how long, or when, that "brief period" was?
  19. All of 2009?

    All of 2009?
  20. I want to hear what you think they should do...

    I want to hear what you think they should do instead of trying to campaign on this issue. I haven't said anything, anywhere, about "packing the courts."
  21. I'm not really sure what the "here you go" is for...

    I'm not really sure what the "here you go" is for since I didn't ask for any of that but... thanks?

    When did the Democrats have their filibuster-proof supermajority in the Senate?
  22. You're telling me what they should've done when I...

    You're telling me what they should've done when I asked you what they should be doing. Unless you have a time machine I'm unaware of, none of that is an answer.
  23. So what should they be doing?

    So what should they be doing?
  24. Of course it is. I do not get this insistence...

    Of course it is.

    I do not get this insistence on being ignorant to the ways campaigns and elections work, and then being upset when things don't turn out the way you want them to.
  25. Yes, I obviously take full responsibility for...

    Yes, I obviously take full responsibility for what the US House and Senate did and did not do in 2009. This makes perfect sense.

    So what rights should we get to codifying into law now, before this...
Results 1 to 25 of 200
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4