Printable View
Cubs pitching is so pathetic! Even though I hope they finish low enough in draft position to get a really good pick, I just can't make myself root against them. About all I can say when they lose leads of 7-0 last night and 4-0 tonight, is at least it gets us closer to that really good draft pick.
I don't care if they lose but it is really annoying how often the Brewers seem to will themselves to victory late over us
Part of me wishes they would go back to the AL Central. Things are cyclical. And the Cubs kicking the Brewers butt will happen again. But at this point, watching the Brewers get bounced in the playoffs will have to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by WOwolfOL
His cutter/slider is legitimately good. He's got solid spin on it (over 2200 RPM) and has seen his best results (a sub .300 wOBA against this pitch, a 30% whiff rate, .217 BA against). His issue is that his FB, while fast, has been misplaced within the zone and is getting hit. Even at 95-96 it should be a weapon. His issue is zone command with his fastball. If (still a big if) this gets ironed out, he's got MLB 7th/8th inning stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stratos
Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk
As of right now, his control is going to hold him back. I see him more as a middle relief guy if he makes it to the bigs. He has 5+ years in the system, and he's 25 years old, and still can't throw strikes. I guess he has a nice CB too.Quote:
Originally Posted by 1908_Cubs
Manuel Rodriguez does not throw a curveball, so I'm not entirely sure where that's coming from. He throws two variations of a fastball (a four seam and a two seam/sinker) as well as a single breaking ball, a cutter/slider. He may "call it" a curveball or something, or someone may have thought it was one during a broadcast, but it tracks as a slider/cutter exclusively with statcast and as a single breaking pitch.Quote:
Originally Posted by thawv
Secondly, how long he's been "in the system" and "his age" is equally as irrelevant and wrong as it has been the other times you've attempted to shame a prospect or the Cubs developmental system. The player Manuel Rodriguez is today has little to do with whom he was a few years ago; he's a vastly different player. He's put on significant muscle and he's added significant velocity in just the last 2+ years. Being 25 and a RP is a very normal thing. Please stop trying to make this a thing. The only thing that matters is who they are as a player. Critique the player.
Yes, the control is the issue. Always has been. I mentioned it in that post. He's got plenty of stuff (his fastball can sit as high as 100, his slider is an above MLB average spin pitch with significant whiff already). The question will be control, especially, fastball zone-control. He gets a lot of whiff's with it, he also has given up almost all of his damage on his fastball variety (both the sinker/2-seam as well as the four seam) because he misses a ton in the zone right now. The good news is that he's a RP, RP's are prone to small sample sizing issues, and prior to about the last week, he had been ERA-successful (though his xFIP predicted this coming) and had really only one bad outing previous. His walk rate has ballooned because of his last week and change, prior to that, it was a manageable rate. I'm hoping this is a young kid, working through the MLB. He killed in in AA and AAA this season. He absolutely shouldn't be written off yet as there's an MLB reliever with some late-inning upside in Manny. How the control is developed in the zone will be the determining line of whether you have a guy who's a capable late-inning reliever or a AAA up/down pitcher.
On the other end of everything...Scott Effross is incredibly fun and I'm glad he's having initial success. He's yet another Cub-developmental RP success story and someone who I am 100% penciling into the BP next year right now (they need to see him at an extended run at the MLB to determine what they have). The Cubs developed him into that sidearm delivery that's catapulted him this year. He's got some really good stuff despite the lower velocity and think there's a Steve Cisek-type, righty/sidearm type of reliever there. Don't pencil him in as a guaranteed thing or anything, but he's someone who should be apart of a 2022 Cub BP from the get-go as long as health persists. I'd buy him as someone who can give you an understated, and surprisingly good 60 IP out of the pen in that Cisek style.
I got it from Fangraphs when I was curious to read the take on him.Quote:
Originally Posted by 1908_Cubs
"Rodriguez will be one of the Cubs' Futures Game reps. He sits 96-98 and will touch 99 while mixing in a power curveball in the mid-80s. He's a 30-grade athlete with relief-only control and projects in middle relief."
You know way more than I do about this stuff, so I'm not going to argue with what the pitch is actually called. I'm just posting what I read.
I'm not trying to shame anybody. It's a fact. He's a 25 year old pitcher who's been in the system 5+ years and still can't throw strikes. It is what is is. They are all facts. If that is a shameful statement, then you're right.
Manuel Rodriguez was born in Merida, Mexico. He's 5"11. He was 17 when he started pitching in Mexico. He's the first player from his hometown to make the MLB. These are also facts literally as irrelevant as his age or how many years he's pitched in the Cubs system. I bet he has a favorite color. Maybe he's got a dog. You didn't mention these facts. Why? If we're just listing facts, let's list 'em all. You didn't list those because it's an incredibly poor attempt, yet again, to shame him or the Cubs for "slow" development or whatever. Stop it. You continue to push this self-created narrative. It was wrong the last time, it's wrong this time. The next time you post it, it'll almost assuredly be wrong again. Just leave that out. You'll notice, no one else is talking about this. When it's you, and you alone pushing a narrative, it's probably not because you've stumbled upon something no one else has. It usually means you're barking up the wrong tree. It's not shameful. And it's really showing a lack of understanding the entire developmental track MiLB players go on. Manuel Rodriguez has moved just fine. That he's even made the MLB is a major developmental win; he was signed out of Mexico as a 19 year old (after an injury plagued season) not on anyone's radar (he wasn't some major IFA win), brought immediately to low-A ball at 20 (a major step up from Mexican professional ball) and has transformed his body and his game into being MLB-worthy in just 5 years (one of which was lost to covid). He has never repeated a single level, essentially skipped AA and AAA, pitching just 20 IP over A+. He's been moved aggressively this season and on a "level per year" through his early 20's coming from small-town Mexican professional ball.Quote:
Originally Posted by thawv
I'm really not trying to be a dick here with that, but there has to come a point where you have to understand; your understanding of MiLB developmental time schedules is wrong and warped and that it needs to be re-evaluated (not stubbornly dug into further). A 20 year old, coming from small time Mexican baseball, taking 5 years (with a year of covid-in between) is not slow development. A 23 year old, coming from SEC baseball, as a 1st round pick, repeating AA and AAA multiple times, taking 5 years, without injury or losing years to pandemics, might be a good example of slow development (though there are extenuating circumstances at times in which injury or, the aforementioned pandemic, added uncontrollable developmental time and we need to be prescient of that, too). You can't just paint a swath over every player and demand they move at uber-prospect pace. It's case by case, player by player and it's nuanced.
Fangraphs may have listed it as a curve (and doing a quick look, it appears they weren't the only ones fooled by his breaker), but my guess is they thought it was a curve, but statcast doesn't track as a curve. End result; he has one breaking pitch. I just don't want anyone to think he's got a good curve on top of a good slider/cutter. It's a single good slider/cutter type right now. He may have changed it's shape a bit this year, changing it from less vertical drop (curve) to horizontal (slider), or it's just one of those things where he calls it a curveball and uses a curveball grip but despite those and because of it's shape in which he throws it, the computer's track it as a slider/cutter. Regardless; just one breaker. Whatever it is.
Ya if he can't throw strikes consistently a contending team won't trust him enough to be a setup guy, most likely middle relief.Quote:
Originally Posted by thawv
Happ probably saved himself another year with the Cubs with his hitting since mid August, probably start in LF.
Right now we're probably looking at Contreras Schwindel Madrigal and Happ as starters, unless a miracle happens Heyward will be in RF again.
So that would leave SS 3B and CF/LF
There a good chance they may just go with Wisdom at 3B and maybe Hoerner at SS or CF
Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
That just might be good enough to not lose 100 games. Buy your season tickets early.Quote:
Originally Posted by chibears55
Im hoping they focus more on adding ready to near ready SP this offseason and start building up a solid rotation for 2023 and beyond when the young hitters start coming up..Quote:
Originally Posted by cuzi
Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
Correct me if my thinking wrong but right now the cubs have 6 SP on their roster..
Hendricks Mills Davies Steele Thompson Alzolay
Hendricks has 2 yrs left
Mills sucks
Davies will be gone
Steele and Thompson seem to be better relievers then starters
Alzolay still questionable but probably wont be better then a 4 in a rotation
They dont really have any SP prospect that will be ready to go come opening day 2022 and they probably only have 2 in Marquez and J.Wicks that we might even see at some point next season.
Why i feel they should focus more on adding younger SP this offseason that are ready or near ready via trades and start building up a stock of pitchers ..
If there a top Japanese pitcher to bid on that under 30 or IFA SP they can sign, be great to see them spend on them over position players too this offseason
Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
OF situation will be interesting next year. With Davis probably getting the call within the next year there's no need to go out and get a CF unless it's a 1-year deal. Could see Happ/Ortega holding the fort in CF until then, or Happ sliding to LF if both are hitting well. I don't think i'd assume Ortega is a starter next year though, he can compete with Nico also maybe. I imagine they go outside and find another OF who can hit, hopefully replacing Heyward. KB would be perfect, he can bounce from OF and 3B based on need, but don't see it happening.Quote:
Originally Posted by chibears55
If Hoyer doesn't sign any FA position players for more than 3 years this offseason I wouldn't be surprised.
Mills has a 4.07 ERA this year as a starter in 17 starts. He's done ok in the MLB. I think he's a usable #5. Amazing what some guys with poor arms can do by just locating and changing speeds well. Jamie Moyer had a decent career with Mills-like skills and tools.Quote:
Originally Posted by chibears55
Like freaking clockwork with these guys
https://twitter.com/YahooSports/stat...024420185.html
Manny Machado seems like a great teammate. What an idiot, lol.
Not saying Machado is a saint or anything, but isnt this the 2nd teammate to get into it with Tatis? Why is Machado immediately the bad guy here? No one seemed to be trying to get Machado to back off.Quote:
Originally Posted by JHBulls
Not sure if I'm picking up what Machado is yelling about correctly, but it sounds like he's saying something to the effect of "It's about baseball. You gotta work for it/on it. It's not about you!" And if I'm correct then Tatis, imo, does give off an aura of arrogance.
Machado shouted and cursed at Tatis, telling him “it’s not about you” and “you go play baseball” after Tatis struck out looking in the fifth. Tatis reacted angrily to the call by plate umpire Phil Cuzzi, and manager Jayce Tingler was ejected when he came out of the dugout to argue.Quote:
Originally Posted by cuzi
The 29-year-old Machado and 22-year-old Tatis were separated by teammates during the incident, which came at the end of the top of the fifth. They eventually made their way to their positions — Machado at third, Tatis at short.
Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
True.Quote:
Originally Posted by cuzi
It would have been better if I found out the full story before calling anyone an idiot. I am sure teammates get into it quite regularly in private so I can’t imagine any animosity comes of it. And I can imagine how frustrating it would be when the Padres were division contenders in spring training and have instead been blown away. .
Machado is a d-bag and ya Tatis seems arrogant, he could be a premadonna who knows.Quote:
Originally Posted by cuzi
The team must be very frustrated because of their collapse, I assume this is the main cause.
I agree. MM may be a bit of a douche, but it seemed like he was trying to teach the kid to be a team player. Manny showed leadership and passion here.Quote:
Originally Posted by cuzi
It seems, as an outsider, that it was typical stuff you see when a team with high expectations struggles. Everyone thought the Padres were the 2nd best team in the NL, and possibly the MLB. I'm sure Machado and Tatis want to play in the playoffs. They are frustrated. It's a blameless situation and nothing more than a baseball incident.
Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk
https://twitter.com/TonyAndracki23/s...832477705?s=19
Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
Wasn't expecting Maples dfa given all the other crud in the pen.Quote:
Originally Posted by chibears55
Maples really sucks. Hoyer has seen more than enough from him. I bet he gets claimed thoQuote:
Originally Posted by Stratos
Maples sucks. No real loss there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stratos
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Maples will be picked up by the Brewers, Dodgers, or Rays and be a stud next year
You never know, he might be back on the Cubs before the season ends because Nico looks at a step and sprains his ankle.Quote:
Originally Posted by WOwolfOL
Wisdom no.27 Rookie record
Love to see him get 30 for the season
Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
Another 3- run bomb by Wisdom. Seems like every 4 or so games, you're going to get about 4 hits including one HR, 3 RBIs, 1-2 walks and about 6 Ks from him. I guess I could live with that in '22. ( Kind of like Javy numbers, but with more walks and less excitement.,)Quote:
Originally Posted by chibears55
Also 144 K's in 321 AB's, gotta be a record too!Quote:
Originally Posted by chibears55
At that rate if he got 600 AB's he'd have 269 K's.
Yeah, i hope Hoyer or the new GM dont just look at his power and ink him in as a starter next season..Quote:
Originally Posted by Stratos
He one that youd hope to get a team to deal a decent young pitcher for
Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
Pretty insane. He's played at damn near a pace of 300 Ks and 50 HR. KB set the record with 650 PA and Wisdom just passed 350.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stratos
NVM
Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk
Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk
I was a big fan of his shortly after they drafted him. I stopped hearing about him after that. Then he resurfaced again!! But honestly, after 10 years of not being able to throw strikes, coupled with his age approaching 30, it was probably time to cut ties with him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stratos
Didn’t mean to quote you , sorryQuote:
Originally Posted by thawv
Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk
Javy has been fantastic for the Mets . He may have saved his FA . Good for him.
Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk