So you would rather we ban hand guns?
You absolutly can kill 20+ people with a hand gun, where the **** did you get the idea that you can't?
And china has had several knife and hatch massacres over the years.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/3...g-spree-n41966
It would be more effective than banning AR-15's but I don't think doing either solves the problems.
Murder and mass murder is not a problem of the "tool" but the person doing the action. We need to figure out what's motivating these actions first and foremost and act on that.
How are mass shootings always portrayed?
https://www.foxnews.com/media/twitte...ssa-identified
Considering we've seen people commit mass murder with:
Trucks
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36800730
Bombs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchester_Arena_bombing
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/3...g-spree-n41966
Knives and hachets.
Guns, and all sorts of weapons...
No, not really, if a psycho wants to kill a bunch of people indiscriminately, they'll always find another tool.
They may be choosing guns for aesthetic reasons, the shooter in NZ picked the AR-15 not because he liked the gun but because he wanted to be seen using THAT one in particular.
The reason that countries like Switzerland aren't seeing more shootings despite similar rates of gun ownership is likely for societal reasons.
One fact that researchers have found about high-profile mass shootings is that they happen in close proximity to one another and that the killers want the attention for doing it. If media refused to show pictures or run the names of the people who do this, we'd likely see less of them.