Updated mock for NFL Draft

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr.B

Reading this makes me think the Cowboys will be drafting Pitts if he’s there at 10. I would hate that move personally.

---

But didn't you defend the Lamb pick because he was BPA? (I agree btw.) Pitts at 10 probably would be BPA. I'm not as high on Jarwin/Schultz like some other Cowboys fans either.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by QB_Eagles

But didn't you defend the Lamb pick because he was BPA? (I agree btw.) Pitts at 10 probably would be BPA. I'm not as high on Jarwin/Schultz like some other Cowboys fans either.

---

I don’t believe he would be best player available at 10. Rashawn Slater would be a better player if he’s available at 10. Farley and Surtain would also be BPA at 10.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr.B

I don’t believe he would be best player available at 10. Rashawn Slater would be a better player if he’s available at 10. Farley and Surtain would also be BPA at 10.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Supposedly he did pretty good against chase young in college

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kobe1016

Pitts will not be there at 15. Patriots will have to trade up. I don't see that from BB.

---

He might. With 5 QBs possibly going top 15 lots of good players are gonna slide.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by QQQ

Supposedly he did pretty good against chase young in college

---

I’d rather get a guy that can block Chase Young in the NFL than a guy that will be out running routes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Trey Lance had a good pro day.

https://twitter.com/brgridiron/statu...890950656?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

https://twitter.com/staceydales/stat...844020226?s=21

https://twitter.com/nfl/status/1369371469579436033?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr.B

I don’t believe he would be best player available at 10. Rashawn Slater would be a better player if he’s available at 10. Farley and Surtain would also be BPA at 10.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Not sure about Slater, but I sincerely doubt there are that many people that would argue Farley or Surtain would be BPA over Pitts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr.B

I’d rather get a guy that can block Chase Young in the NFL than a guy that will be out running routes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Me too

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andrei00

Not sure about Slater, but I sincerely doubt there are that many people that would argue Farley or Surtain would be BPA over Pitts.

---

You doubt it but it’s a fact. Many would put both over Pitts. Not to mention most would consider starting CB a much more valuable position than TE. Farley is probably also a better overall athlete than Pitts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr.B

You doubt it but it’s a fact. Many would put both over Pitts. Not to mention most would consider starting CB a much more valuable position than TE. Farley is probably also a better overall athlete than Pitts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

PFF has Pitts ranked higher than all three you mentioned. Miller has Pitts higher. Kiper has Pitts higher. McShay has Pitts higher. Literally, you're the first person I've so far seen ranking Pitts lower than Farley or Surtain. So not so sure I'll trust you on that being a 'fact'.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andrei00

PFF has Pitts ranked higher than all three you mentioned. Miller has Pitts higher. Kiper has Pitts higher. McShay has Pitts higher. Literally, you're the first person I've so far seen ranking Pitts lower than Farley or Surtain. So not so sure I'll trust you on that being a 'fact'.

---

You’re probably right. I mean there is a long history of HOF TE’s being drafted in the top 10 and teams building their entire offense around a TE.

And in a passing league who needs CB’s that play strong man to man and run 4.2? Those guys grow on trees.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Let's chill with the HOF mention for Pitts. He's great but that's a leap to even hypothetically speak on for any rookie.

And once again I don't see what the history of the TE position has to do with Pitts. Why do I care what OJ Howard did? Sure Gronk and Kelce went in the second - if there were redrafts they'd go top 5. Pitts should be evaluated on his own merits, not anyone else's.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr.B

You’re probably right. I mean there is a long history of HOF TE’s being drafted in the top 10 and teams building their entire offense around a TE.

And in a passing league who needs CB’s that play strong man to man and run 4.2? Those guys grow on trees.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Is this supposed to somehow relate to Pitts being a better prospect than Farley or Surtain?

Matt Light was a terrific player for the Pats. Loooooong time starting LT. Assante Samuel was a terrific CB. Gronk had a better career than both of then. If given the choice to draft one of them, I'm taking Gronk 10 times out of 10.

You have to honestly evaluate the prospects. If you think Pitts is a truly elite and transcendent talent like pretty much everyone does, then that has to elevate him on your board even if others player more premium positions. Positional value does matter, but a special talent at TE is worth more than a really good LT or CB still.