The Cult of Trump

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncos78087

Someone is testifying...the what they're testifying doesn't matter, just the fact that they are testifying.

---

Way to stand up for your fellow STOOGE, Shemp.:hi5:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bird of Prey

Way to stand up for your fellow STOOGE, Shemp.:hi5:

---

Sorry I'm not 100...please use a more up to date reference...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bird of Prey

Oh nate. Why should I need to show you the testimony under oath? Who the hell are you other than a troll on this board? You just like to try and portray yourself as some educated person. I doubt that. Smart people don't resort to cheap shots about typos and punctuation. Are you married to splff by the way?

---

Smart people can figure how how to post a link and quote online articles. They also aren't constantly suckered by braindead conspiracy theories.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bird of Prey

Here you go, nate. Hillary's aide, Mook , was the guy who blew the lid off of Hillary's approval. Not the a-hole being indicted , Sussman, which I've told your sorry *** several times. Now then, nate, go back to your typo checks. Did a misplace a period somewhere? Please take a look or two and report it to the class.

Hillary Clinton personally approved plan to share Trump-Russia allegation with the press in 2016, campaign manager says
Marshall Cohen
By Marshall Cohen, CNN

Updated 6:20 PM ET, Fri May 20, 2022
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, center, accompanied by Campaign Manager Robby Mook, left, and traveling press secretary Nick Merrill, right, on Oct. 19, 2016.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, center, accompanied by Campaign Manager Robby Mook, left, and traveling press secretary Nick Merrill, right, on Oct. 19, 2016.
(CNN)Hillary Clinton personally approved her campaign's plans in fall 2016 to share information with a reporter about an uncorroborated alleged server backchannel between Donald Trump and a top Russian bank, her former campaign manager testified Friday in federal court.

Robby Mook said he attended a meeting with other senior campaign officials where they learned about strange cyberactivity that suggested a relationship between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which is based in Moscow. The group decided to share the information with a reporter, and Mook subsequently ran that decision by Clinton herself.
"We discussed it with Hillary," Mook said, later adding that "she agreed with the decision."
Takeaways from a critical witness in the John Durham probe's first trial
Takeaways from a critical witness in the John Durham probe's first trial
A campaign staffer later passed the information to a reporter from Slate magazine, which the campaign hoped the reporter would "vet it out, and write what they believe is true," Mook said.

---

I guess I need to remind you of your claim again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bird of Prey

now the Durham report charging and prosecuting a lawyer who intentially acted on hillary's request to plant stories of illegal actions with the Russians with FBI agents

---

Do you normally confuse reporters from Slate with FBI agents?


Also, from the same article:

Quote:

---

He has pleaded not guilty and maintains that he went "to help the FBI" as a concerned citizen, and that the Clinton campaign wouldn't have wanted him to meet with the FBI in the first place.
Mook and another top Clinton campaign official, general counsel Marc Elias, reinforced that assertion this week on the witness stand. They both testified they didn't authorize or direct Sussmann to go to the FBI with the explosive Trump tip. Mook said Friday that he didn't even know who Sussmann was during the 2016 campaign, and would've opposed an FBI meeting.
"Going to the FBI does not seem like an effective way to get information out to the public," Mook said. "You do that through the media, which is why the information was shared with the media."
Earlier in the week, Elias told the jury that he didn't authorize Sussmann's meeting with the FBI, which occurred on September 19, 2016. Elias said he hadn't learned about the fateful meeting between Sussmann and then-FBI General Counsel James Baker until Sussmann was indicted.

---

So, again, where has anyone shown that Hillary requested anyone to go to the FBI?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by natepro

I guess I need to remind you of your claim again.



Do you normally confuse reporters from Slate with FBI agents?


Also, from the same article:



So, again, where has anyone shown that Hillary requested anyone to go to the FBI?

---

https://i.imgflip.com/6hmd5h.jpg

We need to keep this one in the holster.

I'm sure he read something from Real American Gun Patriot Press that said it and he'll mangle the link to it in the next post or two after he gets a couple of good insults in.

Something is obviously wrong with poor little nate. Another feeble response where he ignores the proof about a WITNESS not named the indicted lawyer (Sussman). Testifying under oath that Hillary gave the approval to have the FBI be given false information about supposed links to the Russians by the Trump administration.

nate is just a pain in the *** jerk-off. I'VE SHOWN THE EVIDENCE which is all over the news outlets and yet nate as a real STOOGE tries his best to blow smoke over everyone's *** with lies and misinformation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bird of Prey

Something is obviously wrong with poor little nate. Another feeble response where he ignores the proof about a WITNESS not named the indicted lawyer (Sussman). Testifying under oath that Hillary gave the approval to have the FBI be given false information about supposed links to the Russians by the Trump administration.

nate is just a pain in the *** jerk-off. I'VE SHOWN THE EVIDENCE which is all over the news outlets and yet nate as a real STOOGE tries his best to blow smoke over everyone's *** with lies and misinformation.

---

You know your own article didn't say that, right? The testimony you keep referring to didn't, either.

Again:

Quote:

---

He has pleaded not guilty and maintains that he went "to help the FBI" as a concerned citizen, and that the Clinton campaign wouldn't have wanted him to meet with the FBI in the first place.
Mook and another top Clinton campaign official, general counsel Marc Elias, reinforced that assertion this week on the witness stand. They both testified they didn't authorize or direct Sussmann to go to the FBI with the explosive Trump tip. Mook said Friday that he didn't even know who Sussmann was during the 2016 campaign, and would've opposed an FBI meeting.
"Going to the FBI does not seem like an effective way to get information out to the public," Mook said. "You do that through the media, which is why the information was shared with the media."
Earlier in the week, Elias told the jury that he didn't authorize Sussmann's meeting with the FBI, which occurred on September 19, 2016. Elias said he hadn't learned about the fateful meeting between Sussmann and then-FBI General Counsel James Baker until Sussmann was indicted.

---

And from your own post:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bird of Prey

Robby Mook said he attended a meeting with other senior campaign officials where they learned about strange cyberactivity that suggested a relationship between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which is based in Moscow. The group decided to share the information with a reporter, and Mook subsequently ran that decision by Clinton herself.
"We discussed it with Hillary," Mook said, later adding that "she agreed with the decision."

A campaign staffer later passed the information to a reporter from Slate magazine, which the campaign hoped the reporter would "vet it out, and write what they believe is true," Mook said.

---

So, again: you are aware that reporters for Slate are not FBI agents, yes?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by natepro

You know your own article didn't say that, right? The testimony you keep referring to didn't, either.

Again:





And from your own post:




So, again: you are aware that reporters for Slate are not FBI agents, yes?

---

They’re the deep slate!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by natepro

You know your own article didn't say that, right? The testimony you keep referring to didn't, either.

Again:





And from your own post:




So, again: you are aware that reporters for Slate are not FBI agents, yes?

---

He does that with posts as well. What he is reading doesn't translate the same in his mind just judging from his replies. I honestly think he can't remember what he says from one moment to another.

Anybody here have to take care of a aging parent, daily, with cognitive problems and thinks so as well?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncos78087

Sorry I'm not 100...please use a more up to date reference...

---

Okay, Biden. How's that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by natepro

You know your own article didn't say that, right? The testimony you keep referring to didn't, either.

Again:





And from your own post:




So, again: you are aware that reporters for Slate are not FBI agents, yes?

---

You once again are deliberately omitting the truth as the POS that you are. Mook who WORKED for Hillary testified that Hillary approved Sussmans going to the FBI with his deliberate lies about the Russia connection. Hell, you own copied statements show that clearly.

Here it is nate,

Robby Mook said he attended a meeting with other senior campaign officials where they learned about strange cyberactivity that suggested a relationship between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which is based in Moscow. The group decided to share the information with a reporter, and Mook subsequently ran that decision by Clinton herself.
"We discussed it with Hillary," Mook said, later adding that "she agreed with the decision."

I know that you are trying your best to obfuscate the trial of Sussman and the facts that Hillary was involved in the falsehoods about the Trump administration but you are failing thoroughly. Its funny really because you want to portray yourself as being "smart". Hilarious crap by you. Its also funny because it also turns out with the testimony of the field agent FBI people that they understood that the Clinton claim of illegal Russian connection on the part of Trump was TOTALLY CRAP. So, it is apparent that even the rank and file knew that this was a scam by their leadership to go forward with this crap.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WES445

He does that with posts as well. What he is reading doesn't translate the same in his mind just judging from his replies. I honestly think he can't remember what he says from one moment to another.

Anybody here have to take care of a aging parent, daily, with cognitive problems and thinks so as well?

---

I don't know how old you are. All you show is that you can be a liar at any age. You are just a liar. Sussman's case that involves lying to the FBI and making false charges regarding Trump and Russia just went to the jury today. The involvement of Hillary and others in the Obama, Clinton, and current Biden administrations is going to be on its way to another grand jury indictment by Durham's office.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bird of Prey

You once again are deliberately omitting the truth as the POS that you are. Mook who WORKED for Hillary testified that Hillary approved Sussmans going to the FBI with his deliberate lies about the Russia connection. Hell, you own copied statements show that clearly.

Here it is nate,

Robby Mook said he attended a meeting with other senior campaign officials where they learned about strange cyberactivity that suggested a relationship between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which is based in Moscow. The group decided to share the information with a reporter, and Mook subsequently ran that decision by Clinton herself.
"We discussed it with Hillary," Mook said, later adding that "she agreed with the decision."

I know that you are trying your best to obfuscate the trial of Sussman and the facts that Hillary was involved in the falsehoods about the Trump administration but you are failing thoroughly. Its funny really because you want to portray yourself as being "smart". Hilarious crap by you. Its also funny because it also turns out with the testimony of the field agent FBI people that they understood that the Clinton claim of illegal Russian connection on the part of Trump was TOTALLY CRAP. So, it is apparent that even the rank and file knew that this was a scam by their leadership to go forward with this crap.

---

He literally testified exactly the opposite. Again, quoting your post:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bird of Prey

Robby Mook said he attended a meeting with other senior campaign officials where they learned about strange cyberactivity that suggested a relationship between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which is based in Moscow. The group decided to share the information with a reporter, and Mook subsequently ran that decision by Clinton herself.
"We discussed it with Hillary," Mook said, later adding that "she agreed with the decision."

A campaign staffer later passed the information to a reporter from Slate magazine, which the campaign hoped the reporter would "vet it out, and write what they believe is true," Mook said.

---

And then further down in the same CNN article you're selectively quoting here:

Quote:

---

He has pleaded not guilty and maintains that he went "to help the FBI" as a concerned citizen, and that the Clinton campaign wouldn't have wanted him to meet with the FBI in the first place.
Mook and another top Clinton campaign official, general counsel Marc Elias, reinforced that assertion this week on the witness stand. They both testified they didn't authorize or direct Sussmann to go to the FBI with the explosive Trump tip. Mook said Friday that he didn't even know who Sussmann was during the 2016 campaign, and would've opposed an FBI meeting.
"Going to the FBI does not seem like an effective way to get information out to the public," Mook said. "You do that through the media, which is why the information was shared with the media."
Earlier in the week, Elias told the jury that he didn't authorize Sussmann's meeting with the FBI, which occurred on September 19, 2016. Elias said he hadn't learned about the fateful meeting between Sussmann and then-FBI General Counsel James Baker until Sussmann was indicted.

---

This is the article you posted, and it openly and repeatedly contradicts your claim.

Dude's head is so far up his own *** (well that and Trump's) that he can't tell up from down.