Do you think the bluster in place of an explanation is fooling anyone? Multiple people have asked you to explain how it is a slur, and all you can do is call them racist. It's absurdly transparent.
Printable View
Do you think the bluster in place of an explanation is fooling anyone? Multiple people have asked you to explain how it is a slur, and all you can do is call them racist. It's absurdly transparent.
What about not using names to describe dumb people at all? I am just as guilty as others of calling people names, usually the names I call them are descriptive names (ultracrepidarian, troll, etc). They are not insults thrown out at random. They are correct titles.
Lets just say that I don't approve of calling people by names that are ethnic in origin to besmirch them, OK?
This is why it is not a slur:
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/quixotic
This is what you get when you type in Fredo:
https://www.dictionary.com/misspelling?term=Fredo
There is no such term in the English language dictionary.
Stop using ethnic slurs.
It is not a word that is recognized in the English dictionary. It is not part of the lexicon. Was it a slur prior to the Godfather being released? I do not recall. It is a slur today, however. Stop using it, or are you not concerned about the use of ethnic slurs?
There is nothing there. Here is the urbandictionary definition:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Fredo
A pretend racial slur for Italians, made up by CNN’s Chris Cuomo, so he can swear and threaten people.