Printable View
No, you are not. Otherwise, you would had google it yourself instead of asking me, if you were curious about it. Go ahead and read about some of the resident's issues. Oh, I'm sorry for their whining and wishing for safe drinking water.Quote:
Originally Posted by natepro
Sweet lord, just google the story.Quote:
Originally Posted by dbroncos78087
You should probably read what I asked again. Unless you're suggesting Google will somehow be able to tell me what you think.Quote:
Originally Posted by WES445
Are we really going to play this game? You curious about what I'm thinking? Dude, you've been railing about how ignorant I'm for four posts, and now I suppose to seriously think you are curious about what I think? A simpleton according to you. HAHHHHAHAHHAHhahhah Oh, man. that is a good one.Quote:
Originally Posted by natepro
So you can't get laid tonight so you figure you spend time trying to read it? Why? Save yourself some time and read the funnies they are readable and match your comprehensive skills. Where is that "I blame the democrat for the way the republicans vote" post? Did we make a boo-boo and couldn't comprehend a post correctly? An again?Quote:
Originally Posted by natepro
My pleasure.Quote:
Originally Posted by WES445
Anyway, you were talking about how bad things are in Flint still? What do you think still needs to be done in Flint?
Just a friendly tip: you probably shouldn't try to insult someone's intelligence if you're going to use the term "comprehensive skills."Quote:
Originally Posted by WES445
An again!
I always enjoy watching "progressives" declare themselves the arbiter of who is moderate and who is progressive. It's always so grounded and realistic.Quote:
Originally Posted by WES445
No, I don't. I don't even know what you think you read to come away with this take.Quote:
You keep acting like that is my problem.
You keep talking about how you don't care, and then you keep bringing up people to whine about. I'm guessing you're trying to say that Democrats twice lost the House while Pelosi was leading the Democrats there, but the way you're clumsily worded it makes it sound like she lost twice while trying to become House Majority Leader, which isn't true.Quote:
If the democrat can't get voters to vote more of them in office to get it done, I think the blame should go on the directorship of Pelosi, two times loser of the House Majority leader role.
It does make me curious how often you've voted for someone based on who the Majority or Minority Leader was at the time, though. Presumably you think plenty of people do it, based on this random Pelosi tangent, and yet I know I haven't once based my vote for someone based on who the leadership of their party is. Have you?
Another thing I didn't say, but I think we both know I'm going to be saying that a lot as I wade through this mess.Quote:
The base doesn't run the national campaign agenda or set up the DNC policies to attract voters.
This is all in reply to me talking about how the Supreme Court Justices we have ended up there, and yet you're rambling about climate change and fossil fuels and shootings and Build Back Better and education and livestock and, yet again, making up things to be mad about. Zero percent of this was about the Supreme Court which, again, is what you're replying to here. It's all just disconnected rambling.Quote:
Keep acting like what is being done is working. How climate change policies? Still, feeding offshore drilling to the fossil fuels, how is that criminal justice reform package coming along? Y'all really got that BBB plan thru congress. YOu keep thinking what you have in these parties is working when they even told us we have to live with a mass shooting. Oh, well why not be a total sheep, yes we can live with bad education and the shooting of unarmed folks. Don't have the vote, what do you do? Shut up and just vote democrat. How is that working out for you?
And now we're back on the Supreme Court. Kind of.Quote:
Kinda forgot how Mitch re-interrupted the Constitution and say that there wasn't enough time in Obama's lame duck term to constitutionally do it during his last full year, then when Ruth died two months before Trump left office, Mitch rescind his re interruption of the Constitution and insist the republicans had the right to vote in an SC appointee during Trump last few months. Did I get how the Republicans punked the Democrats out of SC appointees? You let them change rules first one way and then another to their benefit. No, Ketanji Jackson's appointment doesn't mean much on my dinner table no more than Clarence Brown getting the position. Only moderates are still into that historical first black-person thing. It doesn't sell beans to me.
McConnell didn't "re-interrupted" the Constitution, a thing that I'm not sure is even possible. I don't think there is a SCOTUS in our history that would've forced the Senate to bring Garland - who I'm sure you also don't like now - to a vote in the Senate. The phrase that is used, repeatedly, in Article II of the Constitution is "by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate." No SCOTUS is going to read that and think it means "the President can force the Senate to vote on a SCOTUS nominee," a thing that would presumably also violate the separation of powers and co-equal branches of government. What McConnell did was blatantly hypocritical, it was clearly a thumb in the eye of the Senate traditions they pretend to care about, but there's no real argument to be made that it was unconstitutional.
But, again, you're just plugging your ears and ignoring how anything works so you can complain about things you very clearly have no understanding of. The Democrats didn't "let them change rules for one way and then another," they didn't have the majority and so they didn't have the votes to stop them from doing it. You may as well argue that I'm "letting" the sun rise in the morning, since I have no power to stop it. They didn't even have the ability to filibuster to stop it.
I'd ask how they should have stopped it, but we both know you don't actually have an answer. You'd have to understand how any of this works to have any kind of answer, and you very clearly don't.
The water problem in Flint is fixed. This is why I asked what you think needs to be done there. Flint has lead levels now at less than half the federal and state standards. The pipes of over 10,000 homes have been fully replaced with new copper pipes. The water source has been changed back to what it was originally, and a new long-term agreement to keep it that way is in place.Quote:
Thanks for the heads-up. Campaign promises are wishes, so I can just skip that whole listening to them and just not vote for them. Cause I just know my super special wish as mines, funny I've been stating the need to fix the Flint water problem not my wish to bed Halle Berry and not get killed by my wife. Is FLint the super special little unrealistic wish we are talking about? Being vague about my "wish" is cheap.
So, again, what more needs to be done? Do you even know, or is Flint just one of those things that took time and so you think it's still not done?
So you don't cite anything and don't know yourself, you just know it's bad. Cool. Solid argument. I can see why you're so upset about it.Quote:
When you put the idea that the BBB became the Inflation Reduction Act on a bumper sticker add a transformer robot/car to the picture. BTW, some corners of the economical study don't think it will be effective and the Europeans aren't to happy with it. I must admit I didn't study the nuts and bolts of it but others' reactions to it.
I'd call it your inability to read rearing it's ugly head again. I asked you what they could've done to not "fumble it." I'm assuming you don't have an answer to this one either?Quote:
what would you call that little circle jerk done on the BBB bill?
None of this is a reply to what I said. I talked about the divided Senate, you rambled about the DNC. My favorite part is how you said "nobody gives a crap about the DNC" in the middle of a rambling paragraph where you say "DNC" four different times.Quote:
HAAHAHAHAHHA. that is a good one, sort of like asking you if the DNC was so good at what they do, why are so many people within their base are pissed off with them. I know, I know, they are a bunch of stupid whiners while the republicans are deplorable, Look the **** around outside your moderate bubble, nobody gives a crap about the DNC but they are concerned about how Congress doesn't work and the DNC gets a share of that blame. I hope the DNC use your tactic to win them back. "Hey stupid!!!"
Another two times mentioning the DNC that "nobody give a crap about." You have a funny way of showing how little you care.Quote:
like I tell my kids when they don't perform right, I don't give a **** about the Republicans this is about you not getting the job done. This is about the Democrats. not the Republicans. They are kicking your arse with two-bit actors, cheerleaders, and game show host, I'm betting the DNC will lose the OVal office to meth head whore named Sally. face the fact, you have to examine what you are doing wrong not blame others to solve a problem. They being stupid just fed into your inflated ego and does nothing for the DNC agenda. I"m happy if you continue thus and totally ignore me. I need the laugh.
When your kids don't "perform right" you tell them you don't give a **** about the Republicans? Do they look at you with the same confusion everyone else does when you say things like that?
As for all that *** kicking Republicans are doing, I wonder if you've been paying attention at all. In 2020 Republicans lost the White House and Senate and Democrats retained control of the House, and in the midterm 2022, when the party in the White House virtually always loses seats in both chambers, Democrats actually gained in the Senate and narrowly lost the House in elections that were so close it took 8 days of ballot counting after the election to determine control. And even then, Democrats gained in statehouses and state legislatures. If that's "kicking your ***," then long may it continue.
Great, then stop whining when you don't get a reply in five minutes.Quote:
Oh, take as long as you wish. If you find Big Foot along the way, tell him I said "Hey"
It sounds like Wes is fine with someone like Trump just as long as they’re ideologically in favor of what he supports. And that scares me as much as the Brett and Specials of the world.
you scare easilyQuote:
Originally Posted by dbroncos78087
How about you quit posting bs lies about what I have posted then. You ain't f'ing all you think you are if you have to resort to lying and playing games. F'ing clown.Quote:
Originally Posted by natepro
Given that I didn't, I guess the problem is solved.Quote:
Originally Posted by WES445
Still waiting on what you think still needs to be done in Flint. Do you have any idea? Or was that just a convenient pawn for you?
Right, anybody who disagrees with you, and speaks badly of the DNC, is a) a Russian stooge or b) a Trump devotee. Now I'm fine with racism after all the uncle tom calling I have done to Trump's butt plug, Candace Owens. What's next from you? I hate blacks and now is a KKK member in good standing? Just completely demonize me for disagreeing with you. Fine, it says more about your mentality.Quote:
Originally Posted by dbroncos78087
Oh, hell. Cheerleaders don't have brains, my bad for assuming differently from you. Now pull out your bright blue poms-poms Pelosi is coming to town.
Then what were you looking up my post for? a hidden d-coder ring?You are such a liar, Nate, and stupidly so to push this farce.Quote:
Originally Posted by natepro
Still, waiting? You silly fool, can't take a hint? Comprehensive skills showing again. Google Flint and figure it out for yourself.
Well, if I'm tossing the word "liar" around, which doesn't pertain to one's intelligence but integrity, I think I will be all right, even with my limited ability, calling you a liar. I know they both start with the letter "I" and you just got confused. Or you just don't know what the word integrity means. Once again confusion indicates the condition of thinking not one intelligence factor.Quote:
Originally Posted by natepro
Just another FYI moment for you, huh? They just come a thousand a minute with you. No wonder you are constantly amazed. Just our little WONDER LAD, yes you are. "Flint got a water problem? Wow, man."
Heartfelt correction: It isn't about your comprehensive skills, they are fine, you are just a liar.