More and more criminal activity from these people. What is the actual limit for Trumpers? We know he can actually shoot someone on 5th Avenue and wouldn’t lose BOP’s support. But what would lose their support?
Printable View
More and more criminal activity from these people. What is the actual limit for Trumpers? We know he can actually shoot someone on 5th Avenue and wouldn’t lose BOP’s support. But what would lose their support?
all the yakking yam has to do is yell "Fake News" and they will believe himQuote:
Originally Posted by dbroncos78087
His supporters are armed and "protesting" (really threatening violence) outside of FBI buildings. And they are unharmed!
Imagine of black and brown people were armed standing outside police buildings in protest of police brutality. We'd see mass arrests and/or executions.
Nothing new. Remember the Bundy’s out west? They took over a government building with force and walked away without anyone dead. They know they “certain” folks are allowed to do that.Quote:
Originally Posted by nyyfan555
There are definitely 2 americas. One where you can't jog in your neighborhood, stand on your own property, drive a nice car, live peacefully in your own home, or be a child and play with friends if you're black or brown. The other where you can flash automatic weapons at law enforcement and go home safely to your family for dinner.Quote:
Originally Posted by dbroncos78087
You mean the burning down of police stations, murder of cops during the BLM riots in 2020 and paying the bonds of rioters by the Demorat Party didn't happen? WHO KNEW?:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by nyyfan555
Source?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bird of Prey
This guy and his selective memory.Quote:
Originally Posted by nyyfan555
So no source. Got it.Quote:
Originally Posted by dbroncsinmo
CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC. All carried the riots at one time or another.Quote:
Originally Posted by nyyfan555
Now try something substantive.
They showed protests. If you can point to a source for the claims made about burning down police stations and murdering police during those protests then I'd be happy to read them.Quote:
Originally Posted by catman
We should also take it a step further because that same person has implied that those protestors who did commit crimes did not face consequence. This was untrue:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...20/6816074001/
And let's take it a step further. There is a very legitimate argument that the protests against police brutality against black and brown people were important and necessary. This contrasts starkly with the protests to defend a lying, thrice married, twice impeached, silver spooned, draft dodging, sore loser.
Looks like Allen Weisselberg is going to be pleading guilty to fraud. It doesn't include a cooperation agreement, but what it does mean is that he can be subpoenaed to testify and cannot plead the 5th with regards to anything he's already plead guilty to.
Substantive like the number of out of state people arrested in those incidents, or the videos of people that are clearly not a part of the protests causing property damage? Or maybe you mean something like the trial of the cops who beat their own undercover colleague because they didn't realize he was one of them?Quote:
Originally Posted by catman
Ruh-oh!Quote:
Originally Posted by natepro
In the least surprising turn of events, Liz Cheney will not be representing Wyoming as a Republican. She might try to run as an independent but I don’t know.