Printable View
OG hit a couple three late so hopefully that gets him going. Powell looks a little lost in the offense right now. The Raptors are playing a little different with the new additions and Chris Finch adding new stuff to the offense. I think we are seeing some of the drawbacks of a shortened preseason even though the players prefer this. The Raptors are not where they want to be on both ends.Quote:
Originally Posted by R. Johnson#3
Sent from my SM-A530W using Tapatalk
Soooo nice watching a bold prediction come true.Quote:
Originally Posted by bartron_44
Siakam looks a lot more buff this season.
It might be for the best. Most of us are ready for a re-tool. Our youth is locked up and emerging.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tg11
It was another solid game from Siakam. His outside shot wasn't falling, but he gave them 15 reb and 8 assists to go with his 16 pts. He's making quick decisive moves when he gets the ball, and he has shown the ability to get the rim, hit pull up jumpers off the dribble and make shots from behind the arc if you leave him open.
Thr craziest part about last game to me was Derozan starting at the 4. I never thought I would see that. His game looked so good last night tossing in 3 triples (in just 4 attempts) when we left him open. We just pounded them inside though with just him and LA protecting the paint. Baynes was looking like an all star with 13 pts and 7 boards in 18 min.
I know we just gave FVV a bunch of money, but I STRONGLY believe this team would be better off going big with a starting 5 of:
Lowry
OG
Siakam
Boucher
Baynes
Then their first sub they go small with:
FVV
One of Thomas/Davis/Bembry
Powell
Siakam
Boucher
And then for a few minutes each half they go with:
FVV
Lowry
Powell
OG
Baynes
This would get 8 guys consistent minutes, keep one of FVV/Lowry always on the floor to run the offense and also keep one of OG/Siakam always on the floor to guard the other teams #1 wing scorer.
If you go big
Lowry (PG)
OG can he even play the 2?
Siakam at the 3 can he even play small forward?
Boucher at the 4 makes sense
Baynes at the 5 makes sense
But better big lineup
Lowry (PG)
VanVleet (SG)
Siakam (SF)
Boucher (PF)
Baynes (C)
2nd unit then you could have
PG- Flynn
SG- Powell or Harris
SF- Anunoby
PF- Watanabe
C- Len
Raptors have too many holes on y'alls team man and that's real talk tho. Because let's face it, ever since both Ibaka and Gasol left, this team defensively are getting outmatched in almost every matchup. I mean against the Pelicans...on the offensive end yeah you kept up wit them until y'all didn't. Taking ill advised shots over and over again but also defensively having no answer for Zion Williamson or Brandon Ingram for that matter.
Against the Spurs, more of the same **** offensively until y'all fall apart. Y'all have no closer on this team. PERIOD. Defensively, the Spurs outrebounded you guys and pounded y'all on the glass for most of the damn game.
Can't even shoot 3s efficiently to save your lives...that is another thing that is costing this team wins in the W column.
We don’t use “y’all” in Canada. You sound like an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tg11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tg11
Sorry, other than on paper that big starting lineup would actually probably play more like:
PG- Lowry
SG- Siakam
SF- OG
PF- Boucher
C- Baynes
Siakam is the creating/scoring wing, and OG is the wing that is going to defend the other teams best scorer. So to answer your question, yes Siakam can play SF. Both he and OG can defend both positions (as well as others) so it doesn't really matter what position you write down for them. I think that is their best defensive 5 man unit, as you need to be able to challenge 3 point shots in todays game of who can shoot the most threes.
Also, our bench hasn't been the same since Fred moved to the starting 5. I really like the idea of moving him back to his best position now that he got his money and has signed on the dotted line. Since they aren't playing Flynn anyway, why not only have not only a PG on the floor at all times, but a fresh PG. We need Lowry to be assertive early on along with Siakam. So it's ok for him to go hard early on and then take a quick break and finish out each half. We don't "need" both of them out there for 35 minutes together, we just need to get them both 35+ mpg.
They are never going to sub 5 for 5, They are on record saying they want to shorten up the bench and get 8 guys heavier minutes more like you would see in the playoffs rather than trying to adjust to that type of rotation come playoff time. So you can't just sub those 5 guys off the bench for 5-10 minutes each half.
Yea.... not to mention no one hear even believes we are contenders this year...Quote:
Originally Posted by ChongInc.
For some it isn't just convincing people of things, they just want to hear (or read) their own voice.
I like that look. This whole two guard lineup hasnt worked plain and simple for long stretches.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bartron_44
Agreed. They’ve been sloppy out of the gate. Could be due to a bunch of new pieces both on the floor and in the coaching staff like you alluded to.Quote:
Originally Posted by aman_13
Neither Baynes nor Boucher do much for ball movement in the offence. Gasol’s ability to make quick passes is sorely missed. While Baynes sets good screens, he’s not a great finisher at the rim. It’s a shame we still don’t have a good big man for Lowry to run the PnR with.
Our defence had been flat out bad. It’s been weird though. In the first q we’ve looked good on both ends in both games. In the 2nd q they just sort of chill for a bit then the entire 2nd half just sucks.
Y'all don't need to just work on your defense PERIOD...should be ashamed of yourselves like it is almost embarrassing...not only too many holes on this team but you guys need to work on finishing at the rim and hitting your ****in shots...better yet get in the gym right now!!!
Y'all will probably take another L when you face the Sixers tonight...who is goin to stop Embiid on this new look Raptors team? Nobody. Who is goin to stop Simmons? Nobody.
VanVleet is probably the only one who is ballin out but he ain't playin like no closer that's for sure. Siakam is supposed to be Spicy P. He should be called Pandemic P with his inconsistent play and you guys call him an All Star. Paul George doesn't even deserve the name Pandemic P, Siakam does not just with his play but he just is not a leader period.
Trolly troll troll. Seriously, why is this guy even allowed to still post this constant jargon?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tg11
Hopefully Masai pulls off that Tatum for Norm swap that’s been in the news lately.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tg11
He’s already been warned.Quote:
Originally Posted by pebloemer