I was just pointing out that Cole had a personal catcher in Houston and it wasn't the guy we signed. That's all.
Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk
Printable View
I was just pointing out that Cole had a personal catcher in Houston and it wasn't the guy we signed. That's all.
Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk
Really? Wrong again my friend. Read it again Jorge. "RA9def: runs per 9 innings of support (or lack thereof) from a player’s defense!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
Defense Jorge, or if you prefer De Fence.
WAR = [[([(League “FIP” – “FIP”) / Pitcher Specific Runs Per Win] + Replacement Level) * (IP/9)] * Leverage Multiplier for Relievers] + League Correction
Please find run support in teh above equation. Take your time.
Robinson Chirinos Yankees deal: $1M base, 500k incentives, multiple outs
Per Heyman
Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk
That sounds about right money wise actually. Would you rather him or Higgy as the backup ?Quote:
Originally Posted by OhSoSlick
anyone know for sure what Wilson contract is and for how much? I've heard MILB deal, 2yrs 4M plus incentives
Its probably pretty safe to say after this move and Wilson that Gardy isn't coming back. Gardy has been great but i think his time has likely come to an end. Hopefully Florials pitch recognition got better last yr because IMO he could be just as valuable, especially defensively as Gardy would be this coming yr
Well with Bruce getting a minor league deal and Allen, plus tauchman I just don’t see how there is room for Gardner . As much as I like Gardner it was definitely time to move on from him .
No, not at all. Keep whining about being a fan of the most successful franchise in MLB history though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
Of course it's not. Let's also not forget that Posada has no idea how WAR works.Quote:
Originally Posted by drt1010
Quite convenient that you only shared the data from the one season in the last five seasons that clashes with what I said. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by drt1010
Wrong again. Please learn to read or at least make an attempt to honestly represent what you have read. :facepalm:Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
Notice how Posada entirely left out the word "defense" in the post where he made this claim? It's either because he has very poor reading comprehension or he was so eager to be right for once that he misrepresented what the article said, hoping that he could pull a fast one.Quote:
Originally Posted by dayners81
Wrong again. Maybe if you weren't so against WAR and actually took the time to understand how it is calculated, you wouldn't so regularly make a fool of yourself in conversations like this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
Actually it was a matter of convenience, it was the first data set that pooped up in the search. I always try to find the most current data. Upon further review I stand corrected, the "new" Yankee Stadium is near the middle/upper half in terms of hitter friendliness.Quote:
Originally Posted by spliff(TONE)
The Stadium is generous for power all-around and it's positively awful for extra-base hits (0.869 factor). Maybe a reason they tend to encourage/ emphasize power, particularly from the left side.
What I am not wrong about is that outside of cole and kluber , those projections for the Yankees starting rotation are not very good at all . I mean None of those other starting pitchers are projected to have a war higher than 2.2 . A 2.2 war is not very good either .
I thought (and hoped) that may have been the case but wanted to make sure. Yankee Stadium has indeed been more kind to offenses than any of the other parks in question each of the last five seasons outside of 2019.Quote:
Originally Posted by drt1010
:cheers:
Apparently this transparent shifting of the goalposts is the closest you'll ever get to admitting you were dead wrong. Maybe try avoiding chiming in so confidently on topics you are so unfamiliar with.Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20