Just another dumb assumption at this point in time.
Printable View
You know Nick, you're right. What have you done for me lately!
All that matters is winning.
News flash! Team with most wins in the 2000's ? Yankees with 2 rings and 4 appearances. Overall record for the decade 965 - 651. Boston 920 - 699 also 2 rings in 2 appearances.
Most wins in the 2010 decade you ask? Yankees (7 postseason appearances) 921- 699. Red Sox have two rings in the decade, but trail in overall wins 872 - 748.
How do you measure long term success?
Nicky, what team in history even comes close to Yankees run from '96 - 2003?
96 to 2003 was great and historic but that was 17 YEARS AGO . Can’t excuse or gloss over the last 17 years , 1 World Series appearance and the worst playoff choke job in the history of baseball .
Giants won it all with Bumgarner as their only decent starter in '14. Weird **** can happen in the playoffs and the best team on paper often comes up short. Not to mention that a lot can change between today and opening day (as well as between opening day and the '21 playoffs).
Pitching gets you to the World Series both teams this year had pitching . The playoffs aren’t as much of a crap shoot as you think it is . They had a lot more than just bumgarner or they wouldn’t have won 3 championships in 5 years and you know that so cut the baloney
Elite pitching and a deep staff is great for a big playoff run but not 100% necessary. Sure, this season the top 2 teams actually made it to the WS and the top seeded team won it all but that sure ain't the norm. It's all about which team is healthy and hot coming in to October.
....and no, in terms of starting pitching, the Giants did not have "a lot more than just Bumgarner" in '14 (the year I very specifically referred to prior to you shifting the goalposts as you love to do). They had Jake Peavy, Tim Hudson, and Ryan Vogelsong who were all at the tail end of their careers as their 2-4 guys that playoff run.
Unlike you, I actually watch these games and know what I'm talking about.
I still think Chapman is excellent. If, though, the Yankees do keep Britton (which we all expect), would it be better to switch their roles? Chapman has given up some memorable home runs and sometimes has trouble throwing strikes. Britton may be better as our closer.