This is why they kneel

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nastynice

No but you said prejudism is based in truths, and so I am trying to show you the root of these prejudisms against blacks.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

---

First of all, I said stereotypes, which are a little different. Stereotypes can be both positive or negative. I still fail to see how the prejudice is systemic.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyc77

First of all, I said stereotypes, which are a little different. Stereotypes can be both positive or negative. I still fail to see how the prejudice is systemic.

---

You could use that stereotype to justify a institutionalized system of unwarranted search and seizure


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blams

Every movement in history - internationally - has had violence occur alongside it.

It is what it is.

The thing to complain about is the injustice, not the resulting civil unrest lol.

MLK and his movement was demonized. It happens everywhere.

It's just the media's way of trying to keep the status quo.

How that isnt obvious to everyone...I dont know lol

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

---

What injustice are you speaking of? The police officers were arrested and will stand trial. That's the very definition of justice.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The20thK

What injustice are you speaking of? The police officers were arrested and will stand trial. That's the very definition of justice.

---

Seems like we are starting the most serious discussion about police reform in my lifetime. You don’t think it has anything to do with it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ewing

You could use that stereotype to justify a institutionalized system of unwarranted search and seizure


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

We should have a law against the illegal search and seizures....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyc77

We should have a law against the illegal search and seizures....

---

We have an amendment but it didn’t stop it from happening. I think you are against stop and frisk now that it’s gone. Convenient. I remember you feeling differently at the time.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ewing

We have an amendment but it didn’t stop it from happening. I think you are against stop and frisk now that it’s gone. Convenient. I remember you feeling differently at the time.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

You can go back and check old threads if you’d like but here has always been take on stop and frisk....

I’m against it from the perspective of the 4th amendment. But as a means to an end, I would hope it could help save the lives of people in the inner city, especially young black males.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyc77

You can go back and check old threads if you’d like but here has always been take on stop and frisk....

I’m against it from the perspective of the 4th amendment. But as a means to an end, I would hope it could help save the lives of people in the inner city, especially young black males.

---

Any other abuses you want to subject young blacks to for their benefit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wisdom is ignorance. Stupidity I call freedom


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyc77

First of all, it doesn’t make me feel defensive. I believe people take it as a slight. It’s not an inclusive saying. Yes, it’s black people stating they want to be treated equally, separate but equal. That worked out well before.

People who say ALM are being inclusive. They are looking at the issues that black people face- police brutality, poverty, etc and saying yes, we agree. Count us in as well.

I would ask why ALM is offensive? It does not mean except black people. It means, in addition too.

I don’t mind when anyone says BLM or supports those causes. I don’t mind when anyone says ALM either. Both sides have good intentions until proven otherwise.

---

That's just wierd. We know alm arose simply out of opposition to blm. How you are naive to their intentions is beyond me.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyc77

First of all, I said stereotypes, which are a little different. Stereotypes can be both positive or negative. I still fail to see how the prejudice is systemic.

---

Sure, well that's why I am trying to steer this conversation to the root of these stereotypes against blacks. If we can get to the root of it, we can get a better idea if they are systemic or not.

What is the root of these stereotypes against blacks?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nastynice

That's just wierd. We know alm arose simply out of opposition to blm. How you are naive to their intentions is beyond me.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

---

I'm sorry, but again....who are...they?

honest question....if someone speaks of a brown person, who do you think they're referring to?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiteWolf

honest question....if someone speaks of a brown person, who do you think they're referring to?

---

Bernie Kosar


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiteWolf

honest question....if someone speaks of a brown person, who do you think they're referring to?

---

Nastynice is the quintessential brown person and I know this because he said it. When I think of a brown person I think of a dude who posts on a dead sports forum in broken ebonics despite being south Asian. For me, that is brown. Anything else is....taupe.