This is why they kneel

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ewing

Seems like we are starting the most serious discussion about police reform in my lifetime. You don’t think it has anything to do with it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

I’m simply asking for the evidence that injustice is committed on a significant level. If you can’t answer that or provide proof, that’s in you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyc77

We should have a law against the illegal search and seizures....

---

Haha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flea

Nastynice is the quintessential brown person and I know this because he said it. When I think of a brown person I think of a dude who posts on a dead sports forum in broken ebonics despite being south Asian. For me, that is brown. Anything else is....taupe.

---

I’m trying to figure out what south Asian is? Lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiteWolf

why do ppl feel the need to generalize large portions of the population?
I guarantee just as high a percentage of right wingers know what the first amendment is about as those on the left. It gets so damn old when those on the left attempt to use 'right wing' as a slam.

---

Because the right misconstrues what the first amendment means every time they something dumb.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The20thK

If there was a drinking game called

Drink every time Valade says "you didn't answer the question"

we'd all be drunk as a skunk!

---

If there was a drinking game called drink every time 20K answers a question after being asked once

We’d all be stone sober!

I know the reason you don’t answer the questions is you can’t. Once I posted a number of hypothetical laws that don’t specifically mention white people but would absolutely target them you went MIA.

What happened? Did the idea of laws that target something without expressly stating who they were targeting make you uncomfortable?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The20thK

I’m simply asking for the evidence that injustice is committed on a significant level. If you can’t answer that or provide proof, that’s in you.

---

prosecuting police for misconduct is the not the norm. When an officer is involved with a shooting often they aren’t immediately questioned. They get to meet get there stories straight and meet with there unions first. The law also makes it very hard to prosecute them and they generally keep a wall of silence.

I’m not going to brother posting the infinite number of links that will verify that officers generally aren’t held accountable and the system they work under is not set up to try and make them accountable. are you capable of admitting they aren’t?



We are seeing more action right now to deal with these problems then we’ve seen in the past. We don’t have to like it but the scene we’ve seen on the street has motivated that


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyc77

We should have a law against the illegal search and seizures....

---

Why? So you can ignore it when it comes to black people?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nastynice

That's just wierd. We know alm arose simply out of opposition to blm. How you are naive to their intentions is beyond me.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

---

How you are naive to their intentions is beyond me...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nastynice

Sure, well that's why I am trying to steer this conversation to the root of these stereotypes against blacks. If we can get to the root of it, we can get a better idea if they are systemic or not.

What is the root of these stereotypes against blacks?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

---

Are you asking why young black, inner city males are typically viewed as dangerous?

If so, I’ll give you three guesses...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Why? So you can ignore it when it comes to black people?

---

I’m sure black people murdering each other in high rates is your preference...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Why? So you can ignore it when it comes to black people?

---

He’s against it bc it a violates peoples rights but for it when applied to black peoples bc violating their rights in their interest based on a prejudiced stereotype that he feels is justified and not a bit racist.

Wanna buy my book on eugenics?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

If there was a drinking game called drink every time 20K answers a question after being asked once

We’d all be stone sober!

I know the reason you don’t answer the questions is you can’t. Once I posted a number of hypothetical laws that don’t specifically mention white people but would absolutely target them you went MIA.

What happened? Did the idea of laws that target something without expressly stating who they were targeting make you uncomfortable?

---

Or maybe some of us work and don’t get a chance to reply to every message? Especially if it’s pages back. I admit I did see your post, didn’t have time right away to respond, and then forgot to get back to it. I’ll go back now and read it so you can quit you’re crying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyc77

I’m sure black people murdering each other in high rates is your preference...

---

Oh I see, you only target black people to protect them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ManRam

Because the right misconstrues what the first amendment means every time they something dumb.

---

thanks for proving my point

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The20thK

Or maybe some of us work and don’t get a chance to reply to every message? Especially if it’s pages back. I admit I did see your post, didn’t have time right away to respond, and then forgot to get back to it. I’ll go back now and read it so you can quit you’re crying.

---

And yet you had time despite your busy work schedule to post about drinking games involving me. Yeah, not buying your excuse, but whatever you need to say to save face...