<a href="https://cyberabhi.com/pokemon-emerald-rom-download/">Pokemon Emerald</a> A pokemon related game played and loved by many
Printable View
<a href="https://cyberabhi.com/pokemon-emerald-rom-download/">Pokemon Emerald</a> A pokemon related game played and loved by many
I’ve been working for the same employer for 15 years. I’ve supervised between 4 and 15 people over that time and I’ve never fired anyone. That’s a same sample size though and it’s a big organization. I admit I do know of 2 firings overall. Still not a lot. Maybe my employees behave bc we treat them well. They know I’m not firing them. Why don’t they run wild? Maybe poor behavior can manifest from areas other then job security?
I shared what we pay these professions earlier in this thread. Do you think 40,000 in a good starting salary for a teacher? Do you think they are generally treated well? Maybe some are underpaid and treated poorly. Do you think it’s possible bad teachers feel used that can be a factor in generating poor behavior? Maybe mass firings won’t help? Maybe it would hurt! I’m sure it depends and some teachers do take advantage of tenure but I’m equally sure your wrong when you say it’s “the cause” of bad behavior and I’m sure you have a strong anti union bias
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I feel like teachers are about at the end of their usefulness given the technological advances we’ve had over the past 20 years or so. Therefore I think $40,000 starting salary is great in the field, especially considering the benefits and perks, like tenure, that accompany the job.
I understand the need and use unions once had in this country, especially in regards to corporations. But they too have run out their usefulness, especially in regards to the public sector. Their entire platform is based on a “strength in numbers/no person left behind” mentality. They support their weakest members to the fullest. This is not a mentality which is beneficial to civilians. If we are not going to change and abolish the union culture in public sectors, than we have no right to complain about the ineffectiveness of teachers or police. We allow it.
I agree you see this from the partisan Dems as well. But you picked a bad example. Trump doesn’t exact have an all inclusive record of opinions. He panders to his base (white males) just like the rest of the politicians. Shithole countries, history of racist policies at his properties, not coming down hard on the white supremacists (because he loves to be loved regardless of who), birtherism, birtherism part 2, Muslim ban, Mexico is full of criminals and rapists.....
Again I agree with the more important notion of your point. No doubt. Just not this example.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is exactly what I mean and it’s not just Trump. It’s every republican. Romney and McCain were racists as well. So it’s sort of like the boy who cried wolf at this point.
Trump has condemned white supremacy on numerous occasions. More than he should have had to. He’s right about Mexico. The people crossing the border are not always doing so with the best intentions. And there are many rapes committed on the border. That’s just reality. Not admitting these issues is racism because it’s the racism of low expectations. It’s the “boys will be boys” of the left. We need to admit these problems before we face them.
Have you ever considered that if majority of minorities are all saying the same thing regarding the right's message, maybe its something in the message, not the people hearing it?
At the end of the day, the mainstream talking heads on the right all.push racist agenda because one of the main groups they pander to is ignorant racist and bigoted white people. It's how they win elections.
I was watching this show the other day, in the early 1900's they used to have zoo's here where they would put black people on display as a link between ape and man. These were mainstream exhibits on and sometimes funded by public money. The racism in America's history is very deep. You can see the remnants of this in today's Republican party. But thank god, before trump they had been moving away from it. The Trump era is a couple steps backwards, but I'm certain they will make that progress again.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
The Republican Party has always supported civil rights. The Republican Party has always been on the side of minorities dating back to slavery. It wasn’t until recently (last 40-50 years) that black people began voting democrat because a very racist Democrat president signed the civil rights act.
The hell do you mean? Anytime a black person is injustly targeted the right is always focused on justifying why it was ok for that to happen. Like Trayvon Martin.
Cmon man, the entire rhetoric on the right is pro white anti minority, what the hell are you asking me here. You seriously haven't picked up on this?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
that's not racist nastynice, that is common sense. just because someone is a minority doesn't make them the victim, people should want details about what happened, and in the name you dropped the details were that the other person used self defense. I know people adamantly did not like that, but that was the reality.