are the 2 pictures included in the tweet before or after the shooting. significantly different circumstances. before, no reason to confront someone simply having a gun. that is what I'm commenting on.
Printable View
Crovash told you he had shot and killed 2 people. You responded to that.
So even if they shouldn't have confronted him prior to the shooting for simply having a firearm, they definitely should have confronted him after he shot and killed 2 people. But they did not.
If they should not have shot him, he is by definition a victim.
Jacob Blake may have been guilty of a great many things. None of those things justified the police shooting him in the back.
You are trying to argue they did while claiming you aren't and that you agree they shouldn't have shot him. You are duplicitous and two-faced for doing so.
I replied to a tweet from spliff(TONE).
https://forums.prosportsdaily.com/sh...6#post33569576
"why would police confront someone with an AR-15"
I'm assume this was before the shooting happened.
what is the evidence that he was a white supremacist? not saying he wasn't, but I want to see that evidence.
everyone should be able to agree that Jacob Blake did not need to be shot in the back. I have said that.
everyone should also be able to agree that Jacob Blake should have listened to police. where is that? I haven't seen anyone saying that.
there was an altercation before Blake even got to the drivers side of the car, it's on video. no he didn't deserve to be shot for that, but he should have stopped. his actions did not help himself. all of that matters.
These cops gonna seal the deal for Biden. How ironic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk