It a humorous response to another poster who kept harping on dangerous blacks. Nothing more.
Printable View
Cute how you respond to my post without responding to the substance.
He is not to be taken seriously. he trying to make a political statement off a joke.
The issue is then stereotyping young black people due to some violence by some. Joey specifically has been talking about stereotyping young black males due to some of this based on those extremes.
What many are pointing out is he doesn't have remotely the same standards for say police and their violence with said stereotyping. I mean choose any identity group you want, you shouldn't take this approach. It isn't that every young black person is violent, the issue is some are and then others use that to push stereotypes/narratives and so on to innocent people due to association to said group.
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/07/wat...-neighborhood/
This is amerikka
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
yup, you got to confront these people. It's his personal birth right to do so.
Good question to ask then:
At what point is a stereotype significant enough to adequately adjust your behavior based on it?
Is 25% of a population high enough or does it have to be a majority or even a significant majority?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/cbs12.c...trump-2020-hat
This is America
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbc...2315066/%3famp
This is America
I don’t know but it’s *** **** away from what is needed to justify the black guys are criminals stereotype. Here this guy does a pretty good job outlining how absurd it is
https://twitter.com/michaelharriot/s...996460033?s=21
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why do Republicans have such simplistic thinking that if a law doesn’t specifically say its targeting someone that means it can’t be targeting someone?
I asked 20K this and he basically ran away because he had no answer.
Crack carries a harsher punishment than cocaine despite not being any more potent. Why do you think that is?