Why are facts bad?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Printable View
Ok, fair enough. Had I seen this post of yours in a vacuum, I wouldnt oppose your stance so strongly.
I dont agree with your reasoning you've been giving throughout the thread, but this is a fair post. I dont agree with this post, I strongly feel that there is racism on a systemic level. I believe that systemic racism is mostly a product of these subconscious prejudisms we ALL individually have against blacks. There are many reasons we have these prejudisms, such as statistical truth behind it, big topic in pop culture, big topic in politics, etc..
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
In a vacuum nothing, but everybody knows you aren’t presenting them in good faith or for sincere discourse, you do it as a really lazy deflection strawman combo because you don’t have the capacity or interest to address the issue.
Literally nobody would say the violence you reference isn’t a problem. But the aggressors in those situations don’t wear the badge and uniform of those sworn to protect and serve the communities of this country. So your lazy “yeah well this other thing is bad so we can’t address this bad thing haha libs” argument is counterproductive. It’s why things never will change. Rather than address a gross distrust and tension between black communities and the law enforcement that brutalizes them in gross unlawful ways, you throw up your hands and say “well blacks are even worse...”. As if that will magically bury the issue.
But you’re the same type who will say there needs to be conversation not protests, but you dismiss either when presented with these silly deflections.
A black man is murdered on film by law enforcement, begging for his life while his colleagues do nothing and guard him.
Your response is “well black people kill each other too so clearly racial injustice can’t exist”
People who respond like this are very much trying to say racism isn’t that big a deal and not an issue with law enforcement, no matter how brutal the newest example is to them. It’s not about “facts” since you’re downplaying ones that don’t appeal to your narrative. It’s really transparent lol
"Cars would drive up, let off the looters, unload power tools and suitcases and then the cars would drive away," she told ABC News. "Then the cars would come back pick them up and then drive off to the next spot. They seemed to know exactly where they were going. Some of the people were local but there were a lot of out-of-towners."
https://abc7ny.com/looting-vandalism...-nypd/6228222/
But the crazy part is at the end of the article where they acknowledge that NYPD is using tracing databases that they said didn’t exist!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can't quote the source because I have no idea what the source is, but NPR said this evening: In 2019 there were 9 unarmed black people killed by the police. In 2019 there were 19 unarmed white people killed by the police.
That’s exactly what he means lol
Do you think he believes those white people were murdered because of racism? (I mean, it’s very possible he does lol)? Nah, it’s a jazz hands deflection from actual identifiable racism to say A. No problem here, no racism, it’s just not true! And B. Actually whites are the true victim.
It’s a total strawman against the actual claims regarding police brutality and racism present in American power structures law enforcement. Nobody cares that “hey look guys more white people died” because they didn’t die because they were white lol. Once he has to address the undeniable issue of racial motivation and the difference in treatment based on that? Then he has to shuffle his feet and cower and make some eff you libs deflection because he’s terrified of having to openly (behind closed doors and in a voting booth is ok) own up to being totally cool with racism and an administration and party that is as well.
They’re empty numbers and presented as some trump card that disproves racial inequality (notice the numbers aren’t backed by how the deaths happened, what transpired etc—there’s a reason for that) in America, but he can hide behind them as some deep factual analysis because “duh er big number > little number” Without having to address anything beyond that. Not to mention racial inequality and police brutality is very present in cases that don’t end in death. There’s a reason he doesn’t have those numbers or want to address the fact those can’t always be numerically stated—racism isn’t something cops just file in a log book when they clock out like “yep pulled over an n word because he was black today”
There’s also a reason he’s ok posting without a source when he’d cry about libs making up stuff if anyone else did lol
I believe he was just repeating a fact....which doesn't state the race of any of the officers, let alone the situations.
But, and I'm not remotely singling you out because we've all done it, this is another part of this whole thing....people say one thing, others hear another. Even with simple things; I've combined with a couple people on a garden and yesterday said to one 'that rain we expected might slide north of us' and the response was 'is it my turn to water the garden?' ....I wasn't even talking about the garden, let alone whose turn it was...I just said it might not rain.
There's a lot of 2 + 2 = 5 going on in this whole situation.