I'm not buying the brain thing that much. But we'll see.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Printable View
Well it seems his political view has changed from what he thought 30 years ago. Yes, Joe Biden has a horrible history, but his opposition has a horrible present. I don’t think you should not vote for Biden because of a political opinion he held 30 years ago but has since changed.
I have a friend who once told me... "Once you start thinking of the police as the enemy, you can never go back." There have been so many blatant acts of police violence in the last week that I'm there. My opinion is full on "**** the police," and I can't imagine that changing unless there is a radical change in how we police.
I have friends and family who are cops and very good people (well one is a very racist friend from college who I don’t talk to anymore).
There are good ones and lots of guys who would run into a burning building to save you no matter your race.
But there are bad bad bad ones. Power hungry nut jobs. Racist *******s.
The problem is people like brewers will pop in and say “what job doesn’t have a few bad people” and again I say:
1 - This is a job with a much higher standard.
2 - It’s not just a few. It’s not all of them, but it’s way way more than just a few bad apples.
We just have to give up the extremes: Not all cops are bad. And more than just a few are very bad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You caught me. I believe there’s a difference between whether we should hold someone’s political opinion against them vs whether we should hold someone forcibly raping someone against them after 30 years.
And before you even start, we’ve already been over this. Go look back at the Kavanaugh thread: nowhere did I actually say he’s guilty, he shouldn’t be confirmed, or any other leftist viewpoint you assume I must have believed simply because I lean left on other things.
I don’t think we should hold Kavanaugh’s yearbook of 37 years ago against him, and lo and behold, we didn’t. I do think if he raped her we should probably hold that against him, do you agree?
You say you agree that there are negative stereotypes about blacks regarding crime and violence. These two played Johnny Law and hunted that black man down thinking he was a criminal because he fit the description of "black man". But now you're saying you need to see tangible evidence of racism in order to entertain the idea.
But you know the VAST MAJORITY of these interactions of prejudism against blacks is not going to have tangible evidence showing such. Do you agree?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
If you’re point was you are selectively editing my post yes I proved your point. Let me post the other part you deleted:
nowhere did I actually say he’s guilty. I don’t think we should hold Kavanaugh’s yearbook of 37 years ago against him
Seriously, do you ever get tired of being a partisan hack? You post less than Special, but you’re cut from the same cloth.
That’s a funny way of phrasing “explaining how political opinion might be different from embracing racism”.
He not only conceded his fault, but explained what he meant with a depth you refuse to explore. He humbly addressed his failing. When you get proven wrong what do you do? Aside from running when someone dies from a disease you called a hoax. I know it happens so much the burden must be a Herculean task but...
We get it tho, there’s a very clear reason you can’t address any of the issues consuming America and can only fling pitiful unfunny one liners at the people who do discuss them.
It’s because you’re a raciest coward who can’t stand to live in a world where he can’t raise his racist son to worship the select Bible passages that empower your racist homophobic views.
The moment you decide to talk at length or explore a narrative, you shrivel and cower and just say “um er Dems are sissies! Lmao good one gotcha”.
It’s why nobody takes you seriously