I didn't see you defending him. Though I do think you are underestimating him by assuming his racial rhetoric is simply stupidity instead of intentional.
Printable View
lol read into it what you want...you're going to anyway
I played contrarian simply because in my view there was a lot of 2 + 2 = 5 in the extrapolation.
Doing so, and knowing more about the state, doesn't make me naive and certainly doesn't mean I'm defending HIM. When I made similar comments awhile back on a faux paus of Biden's funny how nobody wondered why I was defending him....and I wasn't, I simply wasn't making the stretch you guys find it so easy to on simple word choice. What would you like me to say....it COULD have been strictly racist? I believe I did already.
and speaking of misconstruing.....I didn't say he was talking to Germans and Scandinavians...I said most of who he was talking to have that descent since that's predominant in the state...and that many of them are so-called salt-of-the-earth farmers
by name, no....but I was the most recent poster talking against the supposed obvious answer...and he's basically answered the question since, quoting part of what I said
Showing his racism won him an election in 2016. I dont know the motivation behind his comments, but if this race is tight I wouldnt be surprised to see him revert to super racism just because he knows how well it worked last go round.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
no, we don't have to look
but part of my point, I guess, was....had Biden used the words 'good genes' to a group, not a soul here would have questioned why that word choice, it wouldn't have even registered as a question
I don't know, I think 2016 was quite similar in reverse to now....so many people used their vote AGAINST Billary more than FOR Trump....this time it'll be people using their vote AGAINST Trump more than FOR Biden.
not that he isn't narcissistic or whatever term you choose enough to think that's how he won last time, so let's play that song again only louder
Sure, well it would be strange even if biden said it but he dont have the track record that trump does.
With almost anyone I would assume that's a misquote or out of context. With trump, yea, I could see him legit saying insane stuff like that. Par for the course.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
My goodness some of you have a hard time comprehending plain English while claiming I'M the one having the problem.
For one, how on EARTH can you have read all I've posted these past months and STILL call me 'slavishly loyal to a mindless buffoon' let alone fall into the same problem valade did and think Trump OR I referred to any superior genes.
It wasn't a problem, it was reading what he said. If you want to hide behind the fact he didn't say the word 'superior' be my guest.
What is next? If Trump says "black people are the problem in this country" and you going to say "show me where he said all black people are the problem"?
Then it was a problem reading what he said......or the quotes I've seen are incomplete or inaccurate...because all I'VE seen for a quote is this:
“You have good genes, you know that, right? You have good genes. A lot of it is about the genes, isn’t it, don't you believe? The racehorse theory. You think we’re so different? You have good genes in Minnesota.”
yes, he 'invoked' the racehorse theory, ya got me there...
But I'm done with this....another case of 'I don't know why I bothered to comment at all'
As I said before...think whatever the hell you want about me, I still know who I am and what I'm not.