This is why they kneel

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The20thK

Yes, nothing they've said in wrong. Your problem with what they are saying is that those who are far right say similar things but then take it even further... that's what makes them far right. Joey, FNK ect haven't taken it farther (that ive seen) youre just assuming they believe it but wont say it.

---

I have been posting in these forums a good while and Special is the biggest joke/issue/troll we have on this forum. I mean there are extreme partisans each way (brewer/walter) but Special is in a league of his own even then.

I agree fully that you and him seem like a great pairing though!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncsinmo

What a horrible analogy to use for the point you're trying to make. Blue Lives is 100% inclusive of all races and genders.

---

Given that blue lives matter came about as a direct opposing response to black lives matter, I think its safe to say that blue lives matter 100% singles out and opposes blacks.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncsinmo

What a horrible analogy to use for the point you're trying to make. Blue Lives is 100% inclusive of all races and genders.

---

But it only means police. When you say Blue Lives Matter does that mean Firefighters don’t matter? Are you saying Soldiers lives don’t matter? Anyone who isn’t a police officer doesn’t matter?

Because that’s how you’re portraying Black Lives Matter. Blue Lives Matter isn’t inclusive because it specifically separates police officers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The20thK

I don't think so. But Im open to discussing a particular law if you have one.

---

So it’s not possible to have a racist law or a law with racist intent without the law explicitly saying so?

Instead of giving you a law, I propose a mental exercise. You seem like a smart guy. Suppose I asked you to come up with a law to target white people but that the law couldn’t directly say it was targeting whites people. What laws can you think of that would target white people without actually naming them?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

So it’s not possible to have a racist law or a law with racist intent without the law explicitly saying so?

Instead of giving you a law, I propose a mental exercise. You seem like a smart guy. Suppose I asked you to come up with a law to target white people but that the law couldn’t directly say it was targeting whites people. What laws can you think of that would target white people without actually naming them?

---

Obviously, I will say AA.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The20thK

Yes, nothing they've said in wrong. Your problem with what they are saying is that those who are far right say similar things but then take it even further... that's what makes them far right. Joey, FNK ect haven't taken it farther (that ive seen) youre just assuming they believe it but wont say it.

---

It’s funny that you don’t consider yourself as far right as the left posters on here are far left because you don’t espouse far right views. But then go on to also say white liberals are slave masters lol. I think you’re just desensitized you’re your extreme takes.

It’s interesting that you and Joey both subscribe to the same “if you want to help black people you’re the real racists against blacks and if you oppose them you’re the real non-racists”.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The20thK

Obviously, I will say AA.

---

That’s the best you can come up with? That wouldn’t stop very many white people. Can you think of any other laws that could keep out whites people without saying so (note: they don’t have to be real laws, use your imagination!)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mngopher35

I have seen some extreme double standards, lack of consistency and hypocrisy in logic from you while pushing some wild views. You aren't like special as you are capable of defending your stances some more than just posting twitter/media BS but some of your takes are out there in the lack of consistency in logic (I have confronted you plenty on this).

He included Special though, I mean it was much less about you being included tbh than him.

---

I feel like my logic is pretty consistent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ewing

ALM is a smug response to BLM. It ignores what the BLM person is saying. Blacks lives do not need particular attention might not win you friends but it at least acknowledges what the other person is saying


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

I feel like it’s more defensive than smug.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nastynice

Where does most of that prejudice originate from?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

---

Individuals are stupid.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

When did it stop? Are you saying the moment we passed the Civil Rights Act the system immediately ceased being systemic racist?

---

No it didn’t stop all at once. It’s lessened over time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

If they did it as a way to **** down you talking about lung cancer?

---

I wouldn’t know that unless I asked....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

That’s the best you can come up with? That wouldn’t stop very many white people. Can you think of any other laws that could keep out whites people without saying so (note: they don’t have to be real laws, use your imagination!)

---

I was playing youre game buddy. You asked me to come up with a law. I came up with one. Im not making the claim that there is systemic racism inherent in our laws... you are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyc77

I feel like it’s more defensive than smug.

---

Do you feel attacked when someone says BLM?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyc77

I feel like my logic is pretty consistent.

---

I don't wanna just start arguing this without it being on a topic/clear examples to quote otherwise it is just a back and forth without meaning. Agree to disagree. I was far more shocked he included special anyways like I said, you just have had some interesting takes too imo (like Arbery SHOULD have been shot we have already been through etc).