lol, that's fine bro, yes other areas of govt failed too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
lol, that's fine bro, yes other areas of govt failed too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
This is America. Both sides actively sabotage America in order to gain partisan points.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Dbroncinmo hit it on the head earlier, you got white people killing white people. They used to make you hate us. Now they've made you hate each other.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
If masks are required why can’t there be NFL/MLB games if it’s ok to have events like this?
https://twitter.com/phil_lewis_/stat...397903360?s=21
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think he does. I know I do. People don’t like Trump bc he is a reckless, lawless *******. It not a bias it’s an opinion based on a body of evidenceQuote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We shouldn’t have events like thisQuote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Difference these people are wearing masks, in the ball park people would not as they get drunk and eat and talk.Quote:
Originally Posted by ewing
We shouldn’t have events like this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sick Of It All
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
in comparison Trump is just as evil as Kim Jong Un?Quote:
Originally Posted by GasMan
of course that is not reality, but people can be dumb enough to think it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
love the social distancing.
voting in person is relentlessly rejected, but this marching is totally fine.
I’m not going to any events like this. Should everyone have to vote in person bc others are? You are not good at logicQuote:
Originally Posted by SpecialFNK
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Program to Cover Uninsured Covid-19 Patients Falls Short of Promise
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/h...e=articleShare
with proper social distancing and masks, people should be able to vote in person. there would be better procedures to enforce social distancing unlike this or rallies.Quote:
Originally Posted by ewing
There are definitely alternatives unfortunately those against mail in voting are also against anything that makes voting easy and accessible. It’s a hoaxQuote:
Originally Posted by SpecialFNK
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
65 and over white were 45% Clinton and 52% Trump. Those making less than 50k a year were 53% Clinton and 41% Trump, if the poor are dying more I don't see a "Vast Majority".Quote:
Originally Posted by spliff(TONE)
https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-2016
White people are about 40% of the Covid-19 death total, how can a vast majority of the elderly be Trump supporters then the vast majority of all people dying are people of color?
https://www.apmresearchlab.org/covid...by-race#counts
I guess if vast is any percentage > 1% over 50% but the use of the word vast is improper in statistical context because its not defined and that makes it up to the reader to determine what is vast. Trump had a 46% to 48% minority in the popular vote. Do you think Clinton won the popular vote by a Vast Majority. Most people would define a majority as greater than 50%.
For me an overwhelming majority would be in the 60-75% range, a vast majority would be in the 75-90% range, we are nowhere close to any of those numbers.
You are correct on both of the things you said in this post. That might be a first.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
:clap:
Says the ride or die regional manager of Orange Man Good. :laugh2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Ahh....the poor victim: Trump. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Cool. I never used the term "vast majority".Quote:
Originally Posted by SfgiantsJD3
I did (way back and in a post, I admit, that was to mock Republicans)Quote:
Originally Posted by spliff(TONE)
I did not expect anyone to take it all that seriously.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crovash
I know you did. I was simply clarifying that I did not use said term.
which side is against photo ID for voting?Quote:
Originally Posted by ewing
The one that wants to make it easierQuote:
Originally Posted by SpecialFNK
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
photo ID would make it easier. the technology is easy. you match the name with the photo ID.Quote:
Originally Posted by ewing
the only issue is how people get that photo ID, and it should be made really simple to happen.
You're attempting to solve an imaginary problem
Vote by mail /discussion. Easy, simple, safe.
You're arguing about nonsense
simple technology available to anyone, identification with one's picture on it, and people are rejecting that. how can anyone reject something so easy, that we know damn well would better secure who is voting.Quote:
Originally Posted by rhino17
Because not everyone can get an ID and there is no proof that IDs make any kind of difference. You're still looking so solve imaginary problems.Quote:
Originally Posted by SpecialFNK
Send it in the mail, have 6 weeks to drop it off. Easy, simple, safe.
Been doing it for 10 years, great stuff
No it wouldn’t. I’m not against it but it’s does make it harder. Right now I don’t need an ID. Saying I needed one makes it harderQuote:
Originally Posted by SpecialFNK
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
More and more districts in New Jersey are going to remote learning. Governor gave districts the option. Poorer city areas were first to move to remote not having resources to properly distance, etc.
In the poor neighborhoods (mostly black and Hispanic) 270,000 kids do not have access to computers or the internet. Their parents work jobs that don’t have remote ability and they can’t afford childcare or the increase in home meals and medical that schools provide.
Just another one of those reasons the system fails for poor people, mostly minority neighborhoods. These kids won’t have the same quality education or upbringing as affluent areas. It’s been that way for a long time. They won’t have the right qualifications for better jobs. The jobs will be limited.
And the people standing in the way of improving support systems there are the “everyone has an opportunity to rise” and “why are all these crimes from black people” and “why do they riot?” Folks.
Not just the US it seems. Protests in Germany https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkl-I81lKR8
In New Jersey meals are still made and distributed. Either for pickup and sometimes delivery. Devices and internet access has also been provided for many student lacking these things. It’s not an even playing field and not close but i do think these things are worth pointing outQuote:
Originally Posted by GGGGG-Men
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CDC said that just 6% of all reported deaths only had covid on the death certificate. The rest all had other underlying medical conditions
https://nbc25news.com/news/local/cdc...cal-conditions
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...4c05ec3163.jpg
This is pretty stunning if true
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No, if I'm reading it right that is common. HIV hasn't directly killed anyone, but it puts your body in a state where it is susceptible to death from any mi or infection.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
So covid killing people is mostly likely associated with it weakening the body and making it susceptible to other infections.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
If you have an underlying medical condition it makes it more likely for covid to kill you (just as with the common flu). That's a correlation we would expect.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Dont listen to fake news.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
In Texas the schools are offering laptops and daily food for remote learning. Not perfect by any means, but they are trying to close that gap.Quote:
Originally Posted by GGGGG-Men
Still the kids end up alone all day, probably don't learn as well, and the parents have to go and get the food. Also, not everyone has internet access.
Just comes down to that there is no real solution for everyone and that the wealthy are always better off regardless of the situation.
I mean you could have a flu or cold and be 80 years old and could cause you to die. The truth is if you’re healthy or young you really don’t have a high risk of dying from this. We don’t know how much of an effect covid had on these people dying but why are we risking ruining our whole economy over it? The mortality rate now is .2 according to CDC. First estimates it was 3-4 back when this first startedQuote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We already knew that dude. Everyone already knew that. Why are you acting like that's some new revelation?Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Yes we do know how much an effect by looking at the death toll. Almost 200k americans died and their families grieve. That's a HUGE effect.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
The economy doesnt have to be ruined if people where masks. If people wear masks, over 80% of the economy can stay open.
Yes, the mortality rate was 4% but we KNEW that was high, and came down to 0.4% within a month or two. It's hard to get accurate stats right at the beginning.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
We don’t know 200k people died from the virus. We know that 9,000 people died from the virus with zero other underlining issues. How much the virus affected the other people we don’t know!Quote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes we do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
We have years worth of data we can compare this year to and show MUCH higher mortality rates in areas of higher spread.
These are cold numbers with no opinions.
Statistics is a subject we have mastered in numerous ways. There are many ways to corroborate a death rate of roughly 170k.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk