I’ve already said I support both gatherings. I have an issue with people in here saying republicans are science deniers etc for gathering while fully supporting BLM protestsQuote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’ve already said I support both gatherings. I have an issue with people in here saying republicans are science deniers etc for gathering while fully supporting BLM protestsQuote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Everyone SHOULD be, however if an opportunity to bring us toward racial equality presents itself it seems many people are willing to deal with extra side effect for it. For trump rallies, not so much..Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Are there any types of gatherings which you oppose?Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
No because everyone has the freedom to gather for what they want. I don’t want govt official stating what we can’t gather or protest.Quote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oblivious take, imo...Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Essentially, whether we are able to get through this thing with a million deaths and $7 trillion price tag, vs 150k deaths and $2 trillion price tag makes no difference to you..?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
the you have the balls to say this is hilarious. WTF do you do here.Quote:
Originally Posted by spliff(TONE)
Trumpublicans aren't necessarily science deniers just for gathering.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Trumpublicans are more science deniers for politicizing the use of masks and being defiant in the face of logic in the face of a pandemic.
Even having rallies where most people at least wore a mask would at least received less ridicule.
Are there any betters words than Neanderthal and deplorable?
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/s...96671265148928
I wonder how many are involved when they say 'people'Quote:
Originally Posted by dbroncos78087
....but then, it only takes one
That's not how pandemics work, you're not just accepting the risk for yourself, like bungee jumping, your potentially putting other people at risk WHO DIDN'T agree to take that risk.Quote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
Kind like Drinking and Driving.
kinda like political ralliesQuote:
Originally Posted by ciaban2.0
They weren't the one's who politicized it, it was the media, who down played the pandemic and said it wasn't as bad as the flu, and that we shouldn't wear masks because Faucci said so, to doing a full 180* and calling anyone who went outside a grandma killer, and if you didn't wear your mask 100% properly your a COV-IDIOT. And then doing ANOTHER 180* when it came to defending and PROMOTING mass gatherings that they agreed with.Quote:
Originally Posted by SiteWolf
If they had shown any consistency AT ALL this wouldn't have been a thing.
Also, THEY promoted the idea that it's a cultural divide despite the fact that Rep's and Dem's have pretty similar oppinions on covid and mass gatherings.
I agree, there is no moral or health distinction between political events. The virus doesn't give a ****.Quote:
Originally Posted by SiteWolf
I agree. Now could the President have easily stopped either of these events thus preventing public risk?Quote:
Originally Posted by ciaban2.0
I think he could have not held rallies. I don’t think he could have stopped people from protesting
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The distinction is that one could have easily been canceledQuote:
Originally Posted by ciaban2.0
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk