COVID-19 Response: An issue that shouldn't be at all political....yet here we are

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

That's a different topic. There are 63% that want none or limited. That's what I've argued.

---

Ok. Neat. What limitations is the obvious follow up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

You spun out of control. Makes sense, you are left.

Data is what is to be analyzed, not the source. A two year old comes to you and says 2+2=4 and you spend time refuting the source and ignore the data completely. The source means nothing. The data is all that matters.

You're welcome.

---

You have no idea who I am or what I represent. I now know you don’t consider the source. Means your opinion is fiction.

I pity you.

-Stork

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

Good question for the show, would it not?

---

Wait, so we don’t even know where this data came from? How do we know it’s not made up?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by themadstork

You have no idea who I am or what I represent. I now know you don’t consider the source. Means your opinion is fiction.

I pity you.

-Stork

---

Way to say, I have no clue how to debate without saying it.

Go ahead and deny that you are left in politics.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Wait, so we don’t even know where this data came from? How do we know it’s not made up?

---

The show does.

You make it seem like when things are shared things are sourced completely or at all. That's so rich for the hill for you to die upon now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

Way to say, I have no clue how to debate without saying it.

Go ahead and deny that you are left in politics.

---

Since you’re a pizza delivery driver and have obviously never actually debated in any formal setting in your life, allow me to educate you.

In a real, actual debate, you must have evidence for your claims and your evidence must be sourced by a verifiable and reputable source. Some guy on a radio show said something is neither.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

The show does.

You make it seem like when things are shared things are sourced completely or at all. That's so rich for the hill for you to die upon now.

---

How do you know. Did the show say where they got the data so their listeners can look it up if they want? Because right now you are arguing so long as someone says it over the radio we must accept it as true without question. Which seems like an odd hill for you to die upon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

Way to say, I have no clue how to debate without saying it.


Go ahead and deny that you are left in politics.

---

Debate who? A rube that doesn’t understand how to think critically? How facts work?

I might as well debate my dog.

-Stork

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Since you’re a pizza delivery driver and have obviously never actually debated in any formal setting in your life, allow me to educate you.

In a real, actual debate. You must have evidence for your claims, and you evidence must be sourced by a verifiable and reputable source.

The data must come from a reputable source and be verifiable. Some guy on a radio show said something is neither.

---

You clearly are not a debater.

It's the data that matters, not the provider. How much more does that need to be told to you?

You want me to play by your invalid tactics. Hard pass.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

How do you know. Did the show say where they got the data so their listeners can look it up if they want? Because right now you are arguing so long as someone says it over the radio we must accept it as true without question. Which seems like an odd hill for you to die upon.

---

Nope. Not saying that at all.
Open to refutation, it just never occurs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by themadstork

Debate who? A rube that doesn’t understand how to think critically? How facts work?

I might as well debate my dog.

-Stork

---

So you can lose to your dog too? Have at it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

You clearly are not a debater.

It's the data that matters, not the provider. How much more does that need to be told to you?

You want me to play by your invalid tactics. Hard pass.

---

Made State Championships on debate team in HS :laugh2:

The data and the provider matters. They must be verifiable. I mean, you keep saying data but you don’t even know what that word means. Nobody has seen the data, all you’ve heard is the radio man’s claim. That isn’t data. Data is the information he’s Looking at to make the claim.

Invalid tactics? Dude you are a joke who has obviously never been in an actual debate in their life (except over whether a customer underpaid).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

Nope. Not saying that at all.
Open to refutation, it just never occurs.

---

You want everyone else to refute whether the data we haven’t seen from a radio show is fake or not? That’s not how it works. You made the claim, you must provide the evidence.

:laugh:

Tell me you’ve never been in a debate without telling me you’ve never been in a debate

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Made State Championships on debate team in HS :laugh2:

The data and the provider matters. They must be verifiable. I mean, you keep saying data but you don’t even know what that word means. Nobody has seen the data, all you’ve heard is the radio man’s claim. That isn’t data. Data is the information he’s Looking at to make the claim.

Invalid tactics? Dude you are a joke who has obviously never been in an actual debate in their life (except over whether a customer underpaid).

---

Glad your team carried you.

No, the provider does not matter. Again how many times? Just give me a number. I can cut and paste for you.

Yeah, he must be intellectually challenged. This is sad.

-Stork