Do you not know that ivermectin is approved for humans?Quote:
Originally Posted by metswon69
Better be careful not to “catch” hepatitis from a drug… lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do you not know that ivermectin is approved for humans?Quote:
Originally Posted by metswon69
Better be careful not to “catch” hepatitis from a drug… lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No I mean as a treatment for COVID.Quote:
Originally Posted by The20thK
Are they giving it out in doctors offices, hospitals, etc as a widely accepted treatment? Let me know when it gets the type of go the FDA gave the vaccine.
Stop playing these dumb gotcha games and respond like an adult.
its been awhile fellas. what misinformation yall believing these days?
Its been approved by doctors **** the fda. some docs are having trouble prescribing it but they just got a big data dump from japan. its safe af so long as you're not some idiot ingesting volumes meant for horses.Quote:
Originally Posted by metswon69
Oh ur one of those people. OK. here we go.Quote:
Originally Posted by ManRam
Several reasons. Outside of the obvious medical/religious exemptions, natural immunity is superior in every regard so depending on his peer group, its prolly wiser. Its definitely safer than experimental gene therapy in terms of injury/death by a large margin. Scientific studies were already showing that leaky jebs that dont prevent transmission can accelerate mutation. There is significantly less risk of ADE with natural immunity. Jabs aren't one size fits all.
Several high profile doctors have spoken out against jebbing en mass, including one of the bigger contributors to the mrna tech. VS this nobel prize winning drug thats been prescribed for decades, billions of times. Some people just have different risk assessments and they're in a low risk group. And yes, it IS gene therapy, they just knew they could never market it that way to the layperson. Its not a vax
Edit: Forgot to mention a recent study from vietnam showcased 251x viral load in jebbed healthcare workers. its a small subset of society and barely being previewed but I just brought it up to suggest that we're still learning how people are reacting to all this.
This one doctor put it nicely.Quote:
Originally Posted by valade16
For those of you thinking the hesitant were waiting for FDA approval, you have no idea just how much research they've done.
The purpose of mentioning it wasn't approved was for the sake of combatting the nonscientific mandates.
in actuality, you haven't heard the oppositional rhetoric from their experts, just whatever falls down your echo chamber from the anons .Quote:
Originally Posted by metswon69
also, it makes sense japan has the balls to finally do some leg work for mectin. they got the lowest jebbed rate among the powers, they prioritized their elderly but they are directing doctors prescribe mectin to the organics.
Drs are prescribing it. I just told you my uncle is a physician in Texas and he is issuing it. Mostly because it can’t hurt I would imagine as there is no studies that say it does anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by metswon69
By the CDC and WHO are actively looking at clinical trials as a Covid treatment.
Why are you guys so against it? Isn’t anything that could help worth trying or looking at?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know exactly how much research they’ve done: less than the scientific and medical communities…Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronz
It reminds me of the meme of the guy going “Honey, I was looking on the internet and I found something all the experts missed!”
96% of practicing physicians have got the vaccine, every major Medical organization in the United States has recommended getting the vaccine.
But you, a non-medically trained person, googled “vaccine bad” and now you know better? Sorry, not buying it.
As for your leaky vaccines rhetoric that I had to endure from my anti-vaccine friend, can you name other diseases for which the Medical community claims natural immunity is better and diseases for which we’ve attained natural immunity?
Sorry dude, I've seen your conspiratorial filled nonsense discussions you used to have with Spiff on covid. You're the last person I would take any information from.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronz
There are known viral therapies, remdesivir, monoclonal antibodies treatment, etc to treat COVID.
https://www.kens5.com/article/news/h...5-63fa1b7ebf23
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2...study-mcmaster
There are drugs that are showing promise in studies, although it being very early in the process.
Yeah, an Arkansas physician is giving Ivermectin to convicts in the states diagnosed with COVID. That's exactly the quality of care I would hope to emulate.
Meanwhile
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...idget_08252021
Studies that say it shows "no benefit" and multiple sources suggesting potentially serious side effects for a drug that's meant to clean out horse ****. Get real, will you?
There are alot of small trials, thats why its been in the rumor mill since the start of the pandemic, slowly gaining steam. the main reason they didn't look hard enough for treatment options is because if one was discovered, it would destroy the EUA and then we wouldn't be creating these new big pharma billionaires and the greatest transfer of wealth in modern history would be incomplete. Theres been a recent study from what I've heard, Im going to download it in abit to substantiate all this with numbers but Im like 95% sure Im not wrong about japan.Quote:
Originally Posted by The20thK
I don't care if a handful of doctors are prescribing it. Doctors prescribe a lot of unnecessary medication. Same with that Arkansas doctor who is giving Ivermectin to inmates. As I said before, the type of care only the best would get.Quote:
Originally Posted by The20thK
Again, if it passes the necessary testing, I'm fine with it. While we speak its being denounced by the FDA, the CDC is warning against it as it may have significant side effects, etc. When there is more of a consensus on how beneficial its use can be, let me know.
All of this doesn't explain away why people would be more comfortable with a horse dewormer than they would the vaccine. Unless of course you're Chronz. Then it makes total sense.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8203399/
Interesting read
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No need to apologize, idc who you trust.Quote:
Originally Posted by metswon69
vox? those *** holes ran an anti marine piece today and couldn't even accurately picture marines.
its not meant for horses lol, its literally won an award for its versatility.
chairman of Tokyo medical association wants to try it after seeing the success India had recovering from their surge with mectin playing a role. i mixed up the studies so ill just check the one you posted. if its anything like the hcq study, dosage and timing make the difference. if i dont get the jeb this winter im definitely getting some of this stuff prophylactically, theres an OTC version thats a part of the zelenko method.
You mean , unless youre literally one of the biggest contributors to the Mrna gene therapy technology (not a vaccine). Quit trying to make it seem like its just quacks. Ill take the opinion of medical experts over the idiots at the cdc and fda.Quote:
Originally Posted by metswon69