This explains a lot of why you are the way you are. Complete validation of reasoning doesnt just exist if some singular detail supports your way of thinking. especially when the rest of what you said was utter gibberish.Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
Valid non profit organizations dont consistently mislead people by heavily editing videos, many of which have had them be defendants in court. They have as much credibility as OAN or NewsMax in respect to the agenda they are trying to push.Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
I show you that 2+2=4 and you think that's just one answer and not enough to disprove 2+3=5Quote:
Originally Posted by metswon69
This is all you.
Again, ad hominem. You need to speak to the shared video.Quote:
Originally Posted by metswon69
No you didn't. You made one valid point in respect to the vaccination not being in trials and going through the same lengthy process as other medical treatments. The rest is nonsense. There's no reason why you can't make a valid comparison on side effects of the vaccine and drugs that are given out to millions of people.Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
You were the one that is saying they are some valid non profit organization. Prove it or shut up.Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
....says the mindless, slobbering fool that thinks mentioning a radio show (with no specifics) is a legitimate citation and that having the DH only in the AL was an unfair advantage to the NL.Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
Pfizer pretty much came out and confirmed it was true
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If it passed your sniff test, it surely must be true.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
Evidence?Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
A simple Google search turned up nothing. With your confidence, you must have something concrete.
They did exactly the opposite.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewersfan255
New York, N.Y., January 27, 2023 – Allegations have recently been made related to gain of function and directed evolution research at Pfizer and the company would like to set the record straight.
In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research. Working with collaborators, we have conducted research where the original SARS-CoV-2 virus has been used to express the spike protein from new variants of concern. This work is undertaken once a new variant of concern has been identified by public health authorities. This research provides a way for us to rapidly assess the ability of an existing vaccine to induce antibodies that neutralize a newly identified variant of concern. We then make this data available through peer reviewed scientific journals and use it as one of the steps to determine whether a vaccine update is required.
In addition, to meet U.S. and global regulatory requirements for our oral treatment, PAXLOVID™, Pfizer undertakes in vitro work (e.g., in a laboratory culture dish) to identify potential resistance mutations to nirmatrelvir, one of PAXLOVID’s two components. With a naturally evolving virus, it is important to routinely assess the activity of an antiviral. Most of this work is conducted using computer simulations or mutations of the main protease–a non-infectious part of the virus. In a limited number of cases when a full virus does not contain any known gain of function mutations, such virus may be engineered to enable the assessment of antiviral activity in cells. In addition, in vitro resistance selection experiments are undertaken in cells incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and nirmatrelvir in our secure Biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory to assess whether the main protease can mutate to yield resistant strains of the virus. It is important to note that these studies are required by U.S. and global regulators for all antiviral products and are carried out by many companies and academic institutions in the U.S. and around the world.
Fact-based information rooted in sound science is vitally important to overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic and Pfizer remains committed to transparency and helping alleviate the devastating burden of this disease.
Just take his word for it. Dude's really intelligent and never falls for partisan nonsense.Quote:
Originally Posted by nyyfan555
I've read both that he was confirmed to be an employee of Pfizer who was fired after the video leaked and that nobody can actually verify that he was an employee.
Sounds like the kind of "flooding the zone with ****" strategy republicans are known for.Quote:
Originally Posted by valade16
Republicans in a nutshell:
https://coloradonewsline.com/2022/03...or-air-travel/
Seventeen Republican members of Congress have sued the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, seeking an end to the federal rule requiring passengers on commercial flights and in airports to wear masks.
They include: Andy Biggs and Paul Gosar of Arizona, Dan Bishop of North Carolina, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Andrew Clyde and Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, Warren Davidson of Ohio, Bob Good of Virginia, Brian Mast and Bill Posey of Florida and Matt Rosendale of Montana.
And this:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-hand-her.html
GOP Rep Lauren Boebert 'threw face mask at House staffer who tried to hand it to her' after Congress reinstated mask mandate amid surge of Delta variant
And then there's this:
https://twitter.com/JHaidak/status/1...DTyfqy_fssAAAA
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fnv6yaCagAEHwRf?format=jpg