COVID-19 Response: An issue that shouldn't be at all political....yet here we are

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GasMan

Yeah I found that article but it doesn’t come to that mortality rate conclusion you do. How did you get to a 0.2% mortality? And to note, that would still be twice the estimated mortality rate of the flu despite social distancing, masks, isolation.

---

Yeah brewers... Show your work. 532 deaths... you would need 266,000 positive cases to get to that number. Have they got 266,000 positive cases?


Some more info for ya kids..
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news...ng/3065372001/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncsinmo

Vaccines and antibodies.

---

Well yeah if we had a cure it’d be cool

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ewing

So its more deadly?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

How'd you come to that conclusion? We won't know that for a couple years.

We have antibodies and vaccines for the flu. This is brand ****ing new.

You, me, scientists and everyone else won't know the answer to the comparison until we have a vaccine and antibodies.

Edit: Lol. Looks like I ****ed up your edit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncsinmo

Vaccines and antibodies.

---

So Covid kills more people than the Flu because we don't have vaccines and antibodies?

Then how come people were saying this is no worse than the Flu when we didn't have vaccines and antibodies for it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

So Covid kills more people than the Flu because we don't have vaccines and antibodies?

Then how come people were saying this is no worse than the Flu when we didn't have vaccines and antibodies for it?

---

Typical valade. I answered your question and now I have to answer another question.

Are you saying that not having vaccines and antibodies didn't/don't have a role in this?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncsinmo

How'd you come to that conclusion? We won't know that for a couple years.

We have antibodies and vaccines for the flu. This is brand ****ing new.

You, me, scientists and everyone else won't know the answer to the comparison until we have a vaccine and antibodies.

Edit: Lol. Looks like I ****ed up your edit.

---

Well in a way you are right and in a way your are very wrong. Because you are not actually asking the same question...

Your question is Will it be more deadly in 3 years...? I don't know... You are right.

However, the more relevant question for people now is: Is it more deadly now? **** yeah it is! We don't have vaccines and antibodies! Duh!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncsinmo

Typical valade. I answered your question and now I have to answer another question.

Are you saying that not having vaccines and antibodies didn't/don't have a role in this?

---

Obviously you don't have to answer another question, because you didn't

As for your question, of course not having vaccines and antibodies have a role in this.

I'm wondering why conservatives seemed to forget that when they were comparing covid and the flu.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncsinmo

How'd you come to that conclusion? We won't know that for a couple years.

We have antibodies and vaccines for the flu. This is brand ****ing new.

You, me, scientists and everyone else won't know the answer to the comparison until we have a vaccine and antibodies.

Edit: Lol. Looks like I ****ed up your edit.

---

Not really its more deadly right now. It would be less deadly if we had a cure.
Cures are cool [emoji38]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flips333

Well in a way you are right and in a way your are very wrong. Because you are not actually asking the same question...

Your question is Will it be more deadly in 3 years...? I don't know... You are right.

However, the more relevant question for people now is: Is it more deadly now? **** yeah it is! We don't have vaccines and antibodies! Duh!

---

He’s only right if you look at it like Its my immune system versus the virus. It’s like saying cold weather is more deadly then cancer bc if we didn’t have shelters....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ewing

He’s only right if you look at it like Its my immune system versus the virus. It’s like saying cold weather is more deadly then cancer bc if we didn’t have shelters....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Don’t bash cancer shelters, man. They’re a godsend.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flips333

Well in a way you are right and in a way your are very wrong. Because you are not actually asking the same question...

Your question is Will it be more deadly in 3 years...? I don't know... You are right.

However, the more relevant question for people now is: Is it more deadly now? **** yeah it is! We don't have vaccines and antibodies! Duh!

---

No. That wasn't my question at all.

Lol. How'd you concoct that out of my post?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncsinmo

No. That wasn't my question at all.

Lol. How'd you concoct that out of my post?

---

If you can't figure out how saying we can't know the death rate because we don't have antibodies yet isn't asking what the death rate in the future will be, then perhaps you should just stop talking about illness in general.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flips333

If you can't figure out how saying we can't know the death rate because we don't have antibodies yet isn't asking what the death rate in the future will be, then perhaps you should just stop talking about illness in general.

---

Lol. Okay professor. Seriously, lol.

My god the liberals on here are so insufferable


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brewersfan255

My god the liberals on here are so insufferable


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

That's a very fitting description. Very odd group of people for sure.