Originally Posted by
valade16
If someone had suspiciously abnormal numbers, coupled with multiple eyewitness testimony, along with a prolific and well documented history of lying I would give it weight.
You can go back to your 9/11 was an inside job metaphor if you want, but it’s a bad one because it doesn’t take into account the reasonableness of the accusation.
If someone posited the same evidence I had but said it was proof the Chinese artificially created Covid in a lab and their plan was to infect someone traveling to America to cripple us, I wouldn’t believe them. Relative to the evidence that is an extreme claim.
But relative to the evidence “China is downplaying their numbers” is not a ridiculous claim, it’s the most self evident claim imaginable.
I would take far less evidence if someone told me the US was downplaying the number of civilians dead as a result of drone strikes, for instance. Because the US killing civilians and under reporting it is something the US has done frequently.
But if they had the same evidence and tried to say 9/11 was an inside job, no I wouldn’t believe that because it’s an extraordinary claim.
Do you see the difference?