Try reading this nice and slow, nasty: I AM NOT ARGUING THAT CHURCHES SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN AND NEITHER ARE THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE PARTICIPATING IN THIS CONVERSATION.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tD4q3leE5Uw
Try reading this nice and slow, nasty: I AM NOT ARGUING THAT CHURCHES SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN AND NEITHER ARE THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE PARTICIPATING IN THIS CONVERSATION.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tD4q3leE5Uw
The same as what? No because not every business can be open to people right now. As I already covered they should definitely be the same to similar businesses/events which is what was happening prior to SCOTUS getting involved.
You seem to not understand what is being discussed at all. People are saying Churches should be placed with similar businesses and have the same restrictions as them based on public health experts and data around spreading etc. which was done. Churches and You/Site have seemingly been arguing that whatever the most relaxed restriction is using random examples of very unlike things at times should be the restrictions placed on churches irrelevant of that expert health opinion. There hasn't really been reason given for this and the arguments often probably come due to some of the rhetoric used calling people atheists for disagreeing on this idea you guys haven't really explained yet.
Who the hell said anything about whether a baseball game with no fans in attendance is considered a gathering or not and what on Earth does that have to do with this conversation?
My ****ing goodness. This back and forth is becoming more and more mind-numbingly stupid by the minute. :facepalm:
The good news is the Broncos chose to go with a guy with virtually no experience playing QB and he is currently 1-9 with 2 INT. A guy in Colin who led a team to a Superbowl is just sitting there. But management won't sign him because of politics. And the fans will just accept that as an acceptable option.
Yes, you have been arguing that actually. Have you forgotten that you claimed it is perfectly fine that a gym is only allowed a 10% occupancy rate while a church is allowed a 25% occupancy rate?
Unfortunately for everyone on this site, you are both incapable of following a simple conversation and too full of yourself to ever admit that maybe you aren't the smartest person in every discussion you enter. These two things combined make it painful to even attempt having an honest back and forth with you.
Please grow up and learn to have even the slightest bit of self-reflection. It'd go a long way for you both on this site and in your day to day encounters.
Oh, so you don't think that churches theoretically being allowed a 2.5x higher capacity than gyms is perfectly fine? Do you believe that both of these types of establishments should have the same restrictions or not?
I know it's asking a lot but maybe you could start clearing up your all over the place stance a bit by answering these two very simple and relevant questions.