I cant, I'm muslim.. [emoji853]
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
We end the restrictions when it’s safe to do so.
For me it’s a simple calculus. It is easy to provide financial relief to those who are hurt economically by Covid than it is to help people who die of Covid.
It’s odd that you care so much about people’s financial well being but don’t give a **** if they die.
No, again, since the beginning we have known we will not be able to end this thing until either eradication, or herd immunity. Eradication went out the window early on, once 1% of the population gets it I believe it is no longer and option, so since early on herd immunity has been the goal.
How we get to herd immunity can vary. The two extremes are, one, to go about life completely normal as if there is no problem, let it burn through the population over a course of a few months, the economy will temporarily shut down on it's own, we probably have a death toll around 2 million, and the whole thing is over within a few months. Maximum death toll, minimal economic toll.
The other extreme is to stay completely locked down stay at home order until enough vaccine is distributed to reach herd immunity. This is looking to be roughly a 20 month process for covid 19. Minimum death toll, maximum economic toll.
The smarter thing would be to avoid extremes and run a response somewhere in the middle. Set certain effective protocol and strictly enforce it. This allows for a situation where the spread is controlled yet the economy is still open.
I'm just trying to explain to you what is happening and why, this isnt a political argument for me. You keep responding to me as if it is, if that's all you're concerned with then let me know, I'll save my breath.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Hmm I don’t think we can ignore that there would be very severe financial and economic implications for just keeping everything open. Our hospitals would quickly be overwhelmed where not only would we have exponentially more deaths related to covid from overwhelmed hospitals, but we’d have exponential ancillary deaths because the system would be completely clogged up dealing with covid patients. All these dead bodies carry with them implicit significant financial impacts as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The screen. :laugh2:
Go into a 7-11, touch some stuff, give it to the cashier, he touches it. Then you give him money. And then he gives you back money that he got from someone else and your stuff.
But there's a screen just in case your were coughing on each other during this whole process!!!!
I wouldn't be surprised if it actually makes it worse because it's just more surface area for it to cling to near a customer. The funny thing is there's a gap between the screen so the cashier and customer can make the sale. They tend to stand there.