COVID-19 Response: An issue that shouldn't be at all political....yet here we are

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

Glad your team carried you.

No, the provider does not matter. Again how many times? Just give me a number. I can cut and paste for you.

---

This explains a lot about why you believe as you do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by themadstork

Debate who? A rube that doesn’t understand how to think critically? How facts work?

I might as well debate my dog.

-Stork

---

Good to see you around


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by themadstork

Yeah, he must be intellectually challenged. This is sad.

-Stork

---

Agreed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

This explains a lot about why you believe as you do.

---

Aa two year old tells you 2+2=4. A terrorist tells you 2+2=4
How is the provider important to the truth again?

EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by themadstork

Yeah, he must be intellectually challenged. This is sad.

-Stork

---

Its a brett believes world and we are just living in it. It doesnt matter how much evidence someone provides. He's never going to acknowledge that most people support abortion rights when its clearly laid out that way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zmaster52

Good to see you around


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Thanks, that’s kind of you to say. I pop up every now and again.

-Stork

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

Aa two year old tells you 2+2=4. A terrorist tells you 2+2=4
How is the provider important to the truth again?

EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.

---

It’s amazing you actually think you’re correct here and are trying to explain to all of us why the source shouldn’t matter.

I know this will be difficult for you, but imagine something more complicated than a basic math equation and ask yourself if you’d trust a two year old’s word if they told you it’s true.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisond...h=7e10b0850744

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...-most-cases-2/

https://news.gallup.com/poll/259061/...al-limits.aspx

https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-shee...-united-states

https://qsstudy.com/most-americans-s...controversial/

https://apnews.com/article/abortion-...e779b2fb226de5

https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-ins...oll_us_062822/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...-roe-dilemmas/

https://www.thebulwark.com/heres-wha...2022-midterms/

Just on and on about people not supporting the overturn of Roe V Wade and that people want to protect abortion rights. Yet, he'll continue on like none of this matters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by metswon69

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisond...h=7e10b0850744

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...-most-cases-2/

https://news.gallup.com/poll/259061/...al-limits.aspx

https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-shee...-united-states

https://qsstudy.com/most-americans-s...controversial/

https://apnews.com/article/abortion-...e779b2fb226de5

https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-ins...oll_us_062822/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...-roe-dilemmas/

https://www.thebulwark.com/heres-wha...2022-midterms/

Just on and on about people not supporting the overturn of Roe V Wade and that people want to protect abortion rights. Yet, he'll continue on like none of this matters.

---

That to me is secondary to the fact he doesn’t believe the source is important. It’s all about the data, except he hasn’t even seen the data from this radio show, he literally just heard the radio guy tell him something and he believes it.

That’s stunning.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

That to me is secondary to the fact he doesn’t believe the source is important. It’s all about the data, except he hasn’t even seen the data from this radio show, he literally just heard the radio guy tell him something and he believes it.

That’s stunning.

---

No doubt and as Nate pointed out, its a conservative radio show so of course they're going to say that most people don't support abortion rights or want them significantly curtailed. It comes from a very biased point of view and if he can't decipher that, that's on him. To that point, I could find a leftist leaning or progressive radio show that says that most people support abortion rights all the way up to delivery when most Americans fall into that grey area of how long they believe abortion should be legal and under what circumstances.

Either way, none of what he refers to changes all the polls that suggest that the Mike Gallagher show (and whatever he is citing) is not the penultimate authority on abortion rights. Most Americans support abortion rights and didn't want Roe V Wade overturned.

Just a suggestion -- continue this discussion in the abortion thread and leave this one for Covid, OK?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

It was brought out on a Radio Show a week or two back. The data is what needs to be attacked, not the source of the data. I thought we discussed this already. Perhaps not.

---

"a Radio Show a week or two back"

So helpful, so specific. :laugh2:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

Good question for the show, would it not?

---

Even better question for the dope that's latching on to this information as if it were an irrefutable fact.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brett05

You spun out of control. Makes sense, you are left.

Data is what is to be analyzed, not the source. A two year old comes to you and says 2+2=4 and you spend time refuting the source and ignore the data completely. The source means nothing. The data is all that matters.

You're welcome.

---

yOu ArE lEfT

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by themadstork

You have no idea who I am or what I represent. I now know you don’t consider the source. Means your opinion is fiction.

I pity you.

-Stork

---

:clap: