Yes, so spread is not mitigated and so church should be closed?Quote:
Originally Posted by mike_noodles
If we want to mitigate the spread we need universal protocols to be set and enforced, not singling out a church as something that has to remain shut down while all businesses around it are opening and closing.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
You're not good with the sarcasm.Quote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
MLB allowed fans at 25% capacity in to one solitary stadium in Arlington, Texas for thirteen total games (all in October) out of over 1,800 games played across the country during the 2020 season.Quote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
Kinda like how science doesn't care about how much you value attending church? And seriously? You're calling him out for ignorance? That is laughable.Quote:
Again, science doesn't care about your opinion or your ignorance. Virus is something that physically spreads, if we can mitigate spread we are ok, if we can't we aren't.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
You appear to be lost in your own nonsense. Par for the course I guess.Quote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
Nobody is singling out the church as far as closing. They should just be grouped with non-essential. The church would need to do their part. And as we are discussing, they are asking to be exempted from doing their part.Quote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
lol, bro!Quote:
Originally Posted by mike_noodles
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
No ****, Sherlock. You only mention it every other day or so. Too bad it is completely irrelevant in the conversation at hand.Quote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
My reading and comprehension skills are excellent. It's not my fault that your logic and ability to comprehend reality are both severely limited (which is only further compounded by how full of yourself you are).Quote:
You need to read slower. If pakis can learn english, Americans definitely can.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
What? We are saying they should be held to the same standards as other similar businesses. That's not the same thing as not being able to be open, maybe you need to review this thread in full again.Quote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
You have very clearly not been holding them to the same standard as you guys have been arguing against doing so just like the SCOTUS case. You actively chose something with special status to compare them to and ignored obvious differences between them and a business you compared them to. No one here is saying businesses should all be open and churches need to be shut down. They are saying orders that restrict businesses, of which churches fall into a similar category, should all be held to the same standards/restrictions. The supreme court case and arguments made so far in this thread say that it's unfair to hold them to the same standard as other businesses lol. Are you even aware of the case in question?
Maybe you should read through the thread, then try thinking about it for a second.
You also keep inserting things like it's atheist affect. I assume it's also my atheism that has me in many other threads when sluggo or nessy or if we wanna go a different religion being attacked dbroncos make their arguments about religion/religious people of certain identities. Or is it possible that your bias around the topic of religion is clouding your judgement here and you just want to rant without even understanding what is actually being said by others?
It is very simple, not every place is going to be treated the exact same as the next and there are uniform restrictions in place for businesses depending on this and information from health experts. Churches aren't being singled out, they are being asked to follow the restrictions like other similar businesses. You comprehend this right?
I do comprehend what you are saying, which contradicts multiple arguments you have made and the reality of this scotus case being discussed along with misrepresenting what others have been saying in this thread while making accusations around atheism/theism unprompted and for no reason other than probably projecting your own biases.
It doesn't have to value me attending church, it just needs to be followed so as not to spread the virus. If it is possible for a church to be open without feeding into the spread, then why shut it down?Quote:
Originally Posted by spliff(TONE)
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Call me crazy but I think there is way more mental impairment going on here than a few bong loads could ever accomplish. :laugh2:Quote:
Originally Posted by mike_noodles
No, you do. I have been saying that if other places are allowed to open with safety protocol intact then the church should to allowed to do so as well. Me and sitewolf have both very clearly said this numerous times.Quote:
Originally Posted by mngopher35
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
No one, it's strawmanQuote:
Originally Posted by Crovash
No it's not. I said if a church has proper safety in place they should be allowed to operate. If someone is opposing this, they are trying to temporarily ban church.Quote:
Originally Posted by mngopher35
It's your guys argument, not a strawman.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I'm a let that one go, lol..
This is really your idea of an intelligent response? As per usual, you are a complete waste of time and laughably clueless about the very subjects you pretend to be an expert on.Quote:
Originally Posted by nastynice
Not a single person attended a Giants game this entire season (other than a small spattering of media members and club employees....aka zero paying fans). Two playoff series in Arlington, Texas between the Dodgers, Braves, and Rays were literally the only games open to fans this entire season.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_asNhzXq72w