COVID-19 Response: An issue that shouldn't be at all political....yet here we are

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiteWolf

lol so we're back to the mindset that people would starve without restaurants...because they provide food?
Apparently it's essential to eat only within the walls of a public eatery, then? I must be STARVING because I've only done that once in 8 months.

---

Actually, you're dead. [emoji846]


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncos78087

The only essential services that they provide, and I believe NY allowed them to continue based on the guidelines/regulations they put out, is the soup kitchens and other donation services. Those aspects are allowed to continue running. The areas where the churches do the most good and do provide an essential service as there would be people who starved to death if they weren't able to get that food.

---

I have no issue with any of that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nastynice

Actually, you're dead. [emoji846]

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

---

well then why the hell did I just pay my bills?! what a waste, that money could have gone to better use

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nastynice

This doesn't make sense, how could mass gathering be limited to 10 people, yet outdoor dining doesn't have that restriction?

lol, more leeway, same leeway, you dont get my point?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

---

Are you really this dense? Rhetorical question, no answer is needed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

when Trump brought up China, there was push back as if he was lying then. turns out he was right.

---

There wasn't "push back as if he was lying", there was pushback because he was being an uncouth, race baiting piece of ****. Of course you love him for that, so to you it is not an issue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crovash

Stop deflecting to something else (outdoor gatherings) and go back read your own post that I responded to — you were comparing churches and restaurants.



My post in reply proved decisively that churches actually had more leeway than restaurants (you of course whined that it was the opposite).

You were wrong — period. Have the gonads to admit you were.

---

Dream on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nastynice

According to your post, restaurants have no limit to outdoor dining, churches have a limit of 10 outdoor gathering.

Stop playing these psd games, I expect it from some people but not you, you're better than that. You know what point I'm making with that post.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

---

According to your post (the one I'm quoting right now), you either can't read and/or fail in reading comprehension.

The only one playing games here is you. The only question is whether it's due to complete ignorance or a complete inability to ever admit that you could somehow be wrong. My guess is "all of the above".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncos78087

Restaurants are subject to occupancy restrictions similar to churches. If we can't have an honest discussion, then this is going to continue to go around in circles. Hell the restrictions on restaurants as outlined is actually more severe than on churches.



https://esd.ny.gov/ny-cluster-action...ative-guidance

---

Which is exactly what Crovash was saying, and somehow nasty's brain just can't process it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nastynice

Well if you read my initial post regarding restaurants and churches the way you did, am I not just par for the course?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

---

Absolutely not. You are blazing your own trail for intellectual dishonesty and a complete inability to follow a simple conversation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiteWolf

I'm arguing what I have always argued...that essential/non-essential isn't as black and white as many seem to want to suggest and that churches fall into a murky category somewhere in between.

---

Sure thing, boss. As long as we skip over the fact that churches are literally designated as non-essential (and for very good reasons).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiteWolf

lol so we're back to the mindset that people would starve without restaurants...because they provide food?
Apparently it's essential to eat only within the walls of a public eatery, then? I must be STARVING because I've only done that once in 8 months.

---

So we're back to pretending that restaurants can't do takeout and/or provide outdoor, well spaced out dining options?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiteWolf

well then why the hell did I just pay my bills?! what a waste, that money could have gone to better use

---

I've heard of bill payer fraud. It's kinda like voter fraud but instead of casting ballots they pay bills.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spliff(TONE)

Which is exactly what Crovash was saying, and somehow nasty's brain just can't process it.

---

And what I was saying is that many people consider church to be vastly more essential than restaurants.

But when I made that point you guys started playing games, so I just hopped on board.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spliff(TONE)

So we're back to pretending that restaurants can't do takeout and/or provide outdoor, well spaced out dining options?

---

my response was in regard to talking like those well spaced out dining options themselves are essential....food is essential, eating it at a table in a restaurant is not

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spliff(TONE)

There wasn't "push back as if he was lying", there was pushback because he was being an uncouth, race baiting piece of ****. Of course you love him for that, so to you it is not an issue.

---

race has absolutely nothing to do with this.

Trump was right about China, but even before this I already provided evidence of that in what US intelligence said.