He can do little thinking or be critical. So he’s got all those aspects covered. Just not how you suggestQuote:
Originally Posted by spliff(TONE)
Printable View
He can do little thinking or be critical. So he’s got all those aspects covered. Just not how you suggestQuote:
Originally Posted by spliff(TONE)
Here ya go, the latest example of Trump abusing his power and the office and the US AG acting as a personal attorney! The AG represents the people of the US, there should be no question or hint of bias or preferential treatment.
U.S. Seeks to Provide Trump Defense in E. Jean Carroll Suit
By Bob Van Voris
The U.S. Justice Department is seeking to take over the defense of President Donald Trump in a defamation suit brought by advice columnist E. Jean Carroll, who claims Trump raped her two decades ago.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...F-65F14F017A06
So tell me who’s inciting violence Brett, the folks who show up with homemade signs or the ones open carrying AKs?
[QUOTE=drt1010;33586946]So tell me who’s inciting violence Brett, the folks who show up with homemade signs or the ones open carrying AKs?[/QUOTE
I would say the ones who show up armed and even some who don’t have guns on them
https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...ooting-austin/
https://www.newsweek.com/armed-black...n-park-1515494
https://www.wsj.com/articles/violenc...-s-11595784837
LolQuote:
Originally Posted by Kinkotheclown
Again, read the article; You post headlines.Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
Washington Post, a man stopped a car because of concerns regarding what the car was going to do to the protest.
Hmm. Remember that stuff? Crazy White power fools driving cars into crowds? Yeah. So he stopped a car and he got shot. I don't know what your point is there.
For the Newsweek it isn't protestors. This is a militant group looking for the KKK. That's a bit different.
"We are a Black militia. We aren't protesters, we aren't demonstrators. We don't come to sing, we don't come to chant. That's not what we do," he said.
But even within that, the parks department head said
"It's a public park, a state park. We have these protests on both sides of the issue from time to time. We respect people's First Amendment right," Bankhead told WXIA-TV. "We understand the sensitivities of the issue here at the park ... so we respect that and allow them to come in as long as it's peaceful, which it has been."
And the journal article? You didn't read it. Clearly. You didn't
It's pretty clear to me some posters here don't read. In fact, it's a miracle they can read at all....Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinkotheclown
They sure don't have any problem drinking the koolaid though. Good grief some of these comments, I know some like to bury their head in the sand but this is crazy.... Wake up the **** up and try to stop being bias for even half a second. It'll be as clear as day...
Oh I read them , the first said a ARMED BLM protester stopped a car and got shot and killed .Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinkotheclown
I don’t know about you but if I have a gun in my car and some armed Protester comes walking to me with a rifle in his hands , I am sure as hell gonna fire and ask questions later . M
As for the second one it was black militia protesters armed with rifles that were marching and threatening violence . Not people with signs protesting
And the third article was talking About about violence taking places in protests all accross the country this summer and last I checked nearly all protests were left leaning and blm protests .
All I was doing was pointing out that not all blm “protesters “ this past summer carried signs or were peaceful .
No. If I were someone with a gun in the car and about to drive into a protest, I wouldn't shoot first. I would consider why I was driving in that location. If I was someone who wanted a reason not kill someone who disagreed with me? sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
Interesting that you associate a black man with a gun and shooting first. Is your name George Zimmerman, Jorge?
No. The final comment in the article was what I posted and bolded.
Sort of. They started that way but changed the agenda (you are familiar with that trick) but by the end of it the BLM people were calling them out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinkotheclown
Um the blm protester that was killed by a guy driving his car was actually a white guy . Did you even read that first article ?
My problem is not Joe Biden but Kamala Harris. And I think she will alone get Trump re-elected.
People do not want to go far left yet. Maybe in 2050 but not in 2020.
Yes. Both men were white. I've seen the videos, from months ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
It was a BLM protest. Your bone is with that group And yes, I stand by my comment Jorge Zimmerman.
I love Susan Rice. I thought she was perfect. I don't like Harris one bit.Quote:
Originally Posted by rrzubnyy
Willfully and gleefully ignorant. They have access to information that contradicts there preferred outlook, but the sources are conveniently fake news. It’s impossible to wake a person pretending to be asleep.Quote:
Originally Posted by StayOnBoard
I definitely agree on that choice. The Harris pick seems forced.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinkotheclown
Every week you make up a new one. Before the problem was not Biden but Sanders and AOC, then you say Biden has mental delays, now it’s Harris because she must be too moderate for you. Two words in response like the character from the Simpsons “ Ha Ha”.Quote:
Originally Posted by rrzubnyy
I’m trying to see if I can vote against Trump. There are too many roadblocks right now. Empathy is not going to do it for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by flimflamman
Nor will Patriotism, common sense, concern for the economy, national security, rule of law, the environment. Your just changing the subject to distract from evaluating Trump. It’s ok. Do what you want. I am not voting for Trump, I did once and that was enough. My mistake, I was duped. But I am not doubling down to be stupid again.Quote:
Originally Posted by rrzubnyy
I liked Duckworth, but Harris has been great for the ticket. My wife likes her, and donated once she was chosen. My wife doesn’t like anybody.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinkotheclown
I think you are ill. We've not debated. Perhaps you are thinking of someone else. If not, you might want to get help from a true medical professional. Brain issues are no laughing matter. (sincere, I am not looking for a flame war)Quote:
Originally Posted by metswon69
Sorry, how did you refute the facts of the increases in the market? You keep saying he never talks about how well the economy is doing yet he does it all the time.Quote:
Originally Posted by flimflamman
Let's be honest, you weren't ever voting for him in 2020.
Any 401K investments made lots of money. It's those that tried to play broker that lost would be the answer it would seem.Quote:
Originally Posted by rrzubnyy
I'd say it's more like 2 million or more that are grateful for the administrations actions.Quote:
Originally Posted by StayOnBoard
The funds like the C funds and other funds have underperformed. The history is clear over what they have traditionally. You would have made even more without Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
How did you dispute my position of long tern performance ? Look see it your way. I am not a person invested in Trump. I dont have to pretend and exagerate to justify my support for him to myself. I gave Trump a chance and on balance I pass. That is just thinking about the ecomomic issues. Do what you want. But no, Trump has been a failure for me. I won't give him ny vote again. But let’s be honest, there is not anything that would have dissuaded you from voting for him in 2020. You are all in, despite the facts in my opinion, your team Trump, point blank period. That my friend could never be me, I let the performance dictate my vote, had he been better I would have. Unlike you who will despite anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
Well, you and Nicky sure bought in. You both lie and demy like no one's business.
Step one, denialQuote:
Originally Posted by drt1010
With the details so far, Kyle is innocent. That said, I am in favor of all the facts coming to light and a fair trial being held. That said, the numbers of liberals doing this buries any that the right is performing. Do I like supremacy of any kind? Nope. But they have the rights to march, not kill, destroy, terrorize. That's the law we live under.Quote:
Are you certain? Is Kyle Rittenhouse associated with D's?
Were the white supremicists in Charlottesville? How about the Neo-Nazi's who marched on DC?
Way to not provide any specifics. Top notch!Quote:
You have conveniently avoid the crux of the comment, ie Trump's blatant abuse of the rule of law. By one count, he is currently defying as many as 20 different efforts to examine his conduct. Not all of these involve executive privilege. The pattern of resistance is such that we should evaluate the president’s actions against that background and, rightly, conclude that much of the president’s resistance is undertaken in bad faith in an attempt to avoid, or at a minimum delay, scrutiny of his conduct.
Yes really. Clear out the fuel and the fires aren't so bad. But far left environmentalists of California rule policy.Quote:
Cali fires? Really. Flint is an environmental disaster. Trump has consistently and systematically eroded environmental protection at the behest of big oil in particular and multi nationals in general.
Yes, we were over protective putting us behind unnecessarily.
He divested himself right away. That his family has control is perfectly legal.Quote:
Trump has refused to do as his predecessors have done: sever ties to the companies or financial interests that may pose, or present the appearance of, a conflict of interest. By keeping his assets in a family-managed trust, which he can revoke at any time, Trump and his family are in the unique position to profit directly from his public service. Special interests in Washington have caught on. Those seeking to curry favor with Trump are not only donating to his reelection campaign but holding fundraisers and galas at his resorts, private clubs and hotels – the proceeds of which benefit him and his family. When will we see his Taxes? Will we ever see his taxes?
The taxes...LOL
Yes you suffer from TDS. You hate for hate sake and refuse to be honest. I wish you well in admitting your problem and finding help.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrzubnyy
The difference is he lies about EVGERYTHING.
So the department is defending the office as the suit came within his term. No issues there. Show a case before that now the DOJ is looking to take over and you have a case. Will you admit you are wrong with this one?Quote:
Originally Posted by drt1010
You don't even see your own hypocrisy. Hilarious.Quote:
Originally Posted by flimflamman
No, you are going for worse.Quote:
Originally Posted by flimflamman
[QUOTE=Kinkotheclown;33586840]Everyone has more credibility than you. You only lie.
I may not agree with Mush at times or much of the time but he doesn't make up lies about other posters or their words. And in the very rare occasion that he has, he stood up like a man and apologized
That part isn't true. I can attest to that.
Given the crash when Hillary was projected to win, that's a tough one to show anything but losses all around.Quote:
Originally Posted by flimflamman
Again you waffle unlike a conservative. You said you blame Trump, then I show where money was made, then you say you have no one to blame but yourself, then back to blaming Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by flimflamman
You're a CINO (conservative in name only), yes?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
He's 100 times more credible than you. Make that1000 times.
I am not calling you names, or trying to put you in a box. I wish you all the happiness in life, and I wish you a happy long life. I will not vote for Trump and I have outlined why over this entire thread. You want to call me names I am ok with that. Still not voting for him. You have not made an effective case for me to do so. You think you have, I have said why you have not. Then you call me whatever above you that feel should Shame me as a conservative. No matter, I am not voting for him again. In key battle ground states that may make all the difference. We will see what happens. I myself am very comfortable with my choice. In fact, I will contribute again in the next few minutes to the Biden campaign.Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
Here is a word of advice , don’t be telling someone not to call you names and then Brag about donating your hard earned money To a politician . That only proves your detractor right....Quote:
Originally Posted by flimflamman
I did not call you anything. Your actions call you a waffler, not I calling you one. I said your actions are to waffle.Quote:
Originally Posted by flimflamman
I asked if you are a CINO. I did not call you that. I asked as your actions are of a CINO.
I wish you all the happiness too, without the expense of others.
You are entitled to do as you please, but you're like the folks that put ketchup on a hot dog. You can do it, but you can't call it a Chicago Hot Dog.
See now Brett, I am going to continue to be me, you can continue with insults if it makes you feel better. So you can’t convince me with arguments. Now more insults. Why insult me ? Does that make you feel better ? I have given your candidate a chance. I am now supporting his opponent. In this day and age with Trump using the post office, the attorney general, voter suppression, and with Covid 19, the opponent needs all the help he can get. Biden is not a billionaire who promised to self fund his campaign, so I will help with what I can. Plus, since I earned my money it’s mine to do with what I want. I don’t question how you spend your hard earned money ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
You can do whatever you want with it but don’t be complaining about how your 401k hasn’t done well under trump And then go and brag about how you are spending your hard earned money on a politician .I never ever donated one red cent to any politician and never will . And yes Biden Is not a billionaire but where do you think he is getting most of his campaign money from ? It sure is not the every day tax payers . It is a known fact that all politicians are controlled by the top 2%Quote:
Originally Posted by flimflamman