Hahahahaha. Cant stop can you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
Printable View
Hahahahaha. Cant stop can you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
How about this I will stop posting in this thread for 24hrs when You stop with the blanket statementsQuote:
Originally Posted by flimflamman
Or unlike your implied definition of conservatives, he has the intellect and good sense to understand when he should change his mind or at least consider it.Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
Refusing to change your mind and refusing to change direction because of towing a party line and being proud of it, because you feel like you are upholding some programed belief, is about the most ignorant and stupid thing a person can do.
Change is good. Change happens.
Criticizing or categorizing someone for changing their mind or stance because of new info or simply a new view, is arrogant, myopic and idiotic.
Deflect and deny. Did FOX offer a similar argument? You know damn well the point I was intending The defamation suit did occur after the fact. However it begs the question why is the DOJ coming to his defense? Optics are horrid. Has the US AG become his private attorney? The DOJ his personal legal team? You see Brett it isn't hatred that blurs reality, I just refuse to wear rose colored glasses. I don't excuse aberrant behavior well beneath the dignity the office deserves. The man is an embarrassment.Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, said in a statement that she would fight the Justice Department filing. The government’s claim that Trump was acting in his official capacity as president “when he lied about sexually assaulting our client, explaining that she ‘wasn’t his type,’” is “shocking,” Kaplan said.
Kaplan said the Justice Department move came on the deadline for Trump to appeal the state-court judge’s ruling requiring him to provide evidence. “Trump’s effort to wield the power of the U.S. government to evade responsibility for his private misconduct is without precedent, and shows even more starkly how far he is willing to go to prevent the truth from coming out,” Kaplan said.
If approved by a judge, the responsibility for defending the case and paying any judgment would fall on the U.S. government. The case is Carroll v. United States, 20-cv-07311, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
Weak and transparent attempt to once again avert the rule of law.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...arroll-lawsuit
Just for clarity sake, the part of my post you failed to quote suggestin I am not alone in questioning the timing and judgement of the DOJ decision:Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
Legal analyst Elie Honig agrees, calling the move "a wild stretch by DOJ."
"I can't remotely conceive how DOJ can argue with a straight face that it is somehow within the official duties of the President to deny a claim that he committed sexual assault years before he took office," Honig said.
The Justice Department and Attorney General William Barr are already under fire for actions that appear to benefit Trump's political standing.
This is very much consistent with Barr's well-established pattern of distorting fact and law to protect Trump and his allies: the Mueller report, Ukraine, Stone, Flynn, firing of the SDNY US Attorney and, more recently, baseless claims about widespread mail-in ballot fraud. All lies and fabrication Brett?
You have proven yourself to be nothing but a Trump sycophant. As such you are blind to truth and deaf to any argument that runs counter to your obsequious devotion to the orange dotard.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/02/opini...nig/index.html
bolded emphasis added.
If you and Brett can, I will leave the forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Posada20
Both Posada and Brett are so insecure in their beliefs that a person like me who leaves is a major threat. In religious cults what is the first thing the members do to people who leave their organization ? They slander and insult them. If they are not the same actual person, they sure have swallowed the same indoctrination. I am a former Trump voter strident and clearly opposed. They must revile me and I must laugh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinkotheclown
This is a dumb argument to continue on with but I'll go along with it and say: no, they're absolutely not.Quote:
Originally Posted by flimflamman
You tried this same thing with Mush and Posada too. I'm not saying it's impossible that 2 or 3 of the posters in question are actually the same person but their writing style clearly shows otherwise.
Ok. Your right.Quote:
Originally Posted by spliff(TONE)
Stick to bashing their mindless arguments instead of trying to play detective on someone potentially having a dupe account.
If you can watch this and still think Trump is legit doing a good job then......
https://www.facebook.com/CNNReplay/v...Al0A9edDYAJvbB
Your right. Point taken.Quote:
Originally Posted by spliff(TONE)
His hardcore supporters are not interested in facts. Everything the president says is gospel and objective data is "fake news".Quote:
Originally Posted by StayOnBoard
Even when he's captured on both video and audio?Quote:
Originally Posted by metswon69
That's some next level blinders they're wearing.
They will excuse that too sadly.Quote:
Originally Posted by StayOnBoard