could have been unleashed by researchers who sold laboratory animals to the notorious “wet markets” of Wuhan for extra cash.
His theory
The novel twist to Mosher’s theory is that Chinese lab technicians have an unfortunate history of selling experimental animals to vendors such as the ones that ply their trade in Wuhan’s wet market:
Same author. Author. Yes author.
https://nypost.com/2020/02/22/dont-b...ed-from-a-lab/
And then there is this little-known fact: Some Chinese researchers are in the habit of selling their laboratory animals to street vendors after they have finished experimenting on them.
And then there's this
https://www.mediaite.com/news/jesse-...avirus-origin/
“I think the Chinese wet market story is a cover story. And I think that cover story is now blown. And let me tell you why,” Mosher said to Watters, before offering a list of circumstantial details but no real proof, which included the fact that two of the country’s microbiology labs, which have collected extensive samples of bats and bat droppings, are located in Wuhan."
"He wrote an
innuendo-filled and evidence-free New York Post column"
So one writer's theory, what types of books does Steven Mosher write? Even when shown to be unsubstantiated is well known fact.
(Ironically, he calls it a, "little known fact)
Interesting that you believe theory and fact are the same thing. It explains a great deal.
For the record you, I have never reported a poster. Not once. Not even a gobshite like you who has called me multiple nasty things.
Why have I not? Because I am not a ***** snowflake like you.
A snowflake who doesn't know the difference between a theory and a well known fact.