Did they send Florial back down?
Printable View
Floral looks completely over matched at the plate, has a very long swing and obvious pitch recognition issues. Right now he is a pure dead read hitter. If he's going to be anything more than a 4th over he needs to shorten that swing, keep his front shoulder closed and hope that help him with recognition and making contact
Florial reminds me of Byron Buxton unfortunately. Probably a bust.
Buxton is one hell of a defender though. Florial is supposed to be a 65-70 grade fielder with about the same grade arm and double plus speed. He has a chance to be the kind of defensive player that can use that double plus speed on the base paths also. Thats actually a great comp, Florial might have a bit more power but then there is that whole making contact thing he struggles with though
Nice to finally see Garcia pitch. He was really good. Very smooth, can’t wait to see Schmidt too. And King is also very composed. Wow, and Lasagna, they have some good young arms. Then Montgomery and German, they suddenly produced promising pitchers. What does Garcia project as a 2, 3, or 4 in the rotation? Hope home grown Severino comes back as our number 2. Let Paxton walk.
Lol a 6.53 era in king is nothing to be crowing about . Schmidt and Garcia have one mlb start between them and you are declaring them the future . Then there is German who hasn’t thrown the ball in a year abd with all that you are declaring the yanks are set . And you say I have been posting dumb things .
Fact is any of these pitchers turn out good you will be saying you loved them from the start when everybody else said they should be traded.
If those pitchers turn out great then I will give cashman credit for keeping them but the odds of more than 1 of them turning out to be the tor pitcher they still need are very very low . That is why atleast one of those 3 pitching prospects should be traded .heck someone on this board stated that Garcia should be traded because the experts said his small frame won’t be optimal for a long term career as a starting pitcher . So why not trade him while he has value ? Why hold on to him ?
Its not that easy. You have to find a partner who is willing to give you more than just a JA Happ type. I wish we could just trade Deivi Garcia for Mike Clevinger and be done with it... but it's not that simple. Every team's scouts have a prospect or two that they see as their top target. The teams who have those prospects will always have the best chance to get the best players. No point in trading Deivi Garcia if you get Caleb Smith back right?
For a trade to happen, teams have to match up. I'm a big fan of Deivi Garcia and Clarke Schmidt, but there are plenty of better pitching prospects out there. So I agree completely that when you can trade prospects for a proven guy you should do it (though it didn't work out so great when they got Sonny Gray and James Paxton, two trades very few complained about at the time they were made). On the other hand, those trades are not easy to make happen. Therefore, I choose to root for a player to become a great pitcher for the Yankees, rather than rooting for them to get traded. If and when they get traded, I am not usually upset about parting ways with the prospect.
All of that being said, Posada, please don't take this the wrong way. What you choose to hope for is your own decision, not mine. All I'm saying is that it's not practical to expect these prospects to be traded, though hoping for it is perfectly fine if thats your bag.
But thats the thing all reports said that it would have taken Garcia and Frazier or Schmidt and Frazier to get it done . The gray and happ trades didn’t require top yankee prospects . Paxton did but they could have done better for sheffield. And it also not practical to think even most top prospects that are mentioned in trades are going to pan out to anything great or good enough to help the team win the ws . See where I find fault is that cashman and the front office keeps looking 3 to 5 years ahead instead of looking what is directly in front of that , and the Mess that is starting rotation behind cole is proof of that . Cashman has been doing that approach without change since 2007 and 08 when he banked the future of the starting rotation on Hughes , Kennedy and joba. And we all see how that turned out . And he did it again with the killer bs and then again with Sanchez , judge , serevino and andujar , and again with mixed results at best . I am not including Torres because he was developed in the indians farm system and took less than 2 years before he was ready to be called up . The definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over again Expecting different results . And that is what cashman has been doing since 2007 . After 13 years of bad and mixed results at best, logic would dictate a different approach. Now if you don’t agree with that , that is fine but my opinion stands and the results of the last 12 seasons speak for themselves .