:eyebrow:Quote:
Originally Posted by ewing
as if Vanity Fair is going to let random people borrow $14,000 worth of clothes and accessories.
Printable View
:eyebrow:Quote:
Originally Posted by ewing
as if Vanity Fair is going to let random people borrow $14,000 worth of clothes and accessories.
I could have sworn the title of this thread was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by browski234
I hear ex-lax is still available in Canada.Quote:
Originally Posted by SpecialFNK
umm, people they put on their cover aren't random.....and if borrowed, meaning just long enough to do the shoot and not even leave the building with any of it...not borrowed like a library book, sign it out and bring it back in 2 weeksQuote:
Originally Posted by SpecialFNK
I know, that is the point. AOC has pushed hard for random people who during this pandemic have struggled to simply pay their rent. that is why I asked, how many of these people can afford these type of clothes, and the answer is likely none at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by SiteWolf
I think this could have been a great opportunity for AOC while pushing hard to help these people, did a photoshoot with still high quality clothes that these people could afford. it could have been AOC looking good, and the average American could also look just as good in the same affordable clothing. I could have supported AOC doing that, it could have been a great message during a crisis (Covid19).
Your fixation on this is wholly unhealthy and unnecessary.
Ya especially considering in Canada AOC would reside in our NDP Party. People like her aren't overly rare in Canadian politics.
If anything I think Special likes AOC but she won't say she likes him back.Quote:
Originally Posted by SiteWolf
She won pretty handedly considering the gop dropped 10 million on her opponent and had constant commercials going on.
It was the second most expensive house race.
and now someone has taken over as youngest to be elected to the House.........25 yr old Madison Cawthorne in North Carolina
Which is 1/10th what the Dems wasted in the SC Senate race.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sick Of It All
Be noice to get the $$$$ out of all these races.
Yes, it would be. How that will happen is unclear; that it will not happen any time soon is very clear.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sluggo1
Yeah that’s wasted money, but I get it why they do it.
You don't really need all that much to run for Rep. A little more to run for Sen. Not sure how to handle the $$$ for Pres.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crovash
One simple law that should be instituted……you shouls not be allowed to donate to someone you cannot vote for.
……………
The guy that spent the 100 mil in SC
And I think there was someone else that did this (can't remember who)
Bloomberg spent a boatload in FL to get felons the right to vote
10 mil on the AOC election
I can't help but thinking that all this $$$ could be put tp better use.
You want to spend 100 mil in SC……great, build some housing for the poor. Same with the other guy, same with Bloomie and the guy un the South Bronx.
Get the $$$ out of it.
What “should” be done is irrelevant, albeit nice to dream about.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sluggo1
What “can” be done, however, is precisely what won’t be done, given the current state of the country — see Citizens v. United among other SCOTUS rulings.